Estimation of nitrate removal by riparian wetlands and streams in agricultural catchments: effect of discharge and stream order

1. Assessment of the role of landscape structures such as buffers is a necessary prerequisite for the sustainable management of water resources in an agricultural setting. 2. We monitored nitrate concentrations during interstorm periods at the outlet of 16 subcatchments of different orders within a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Freshwater biology 2010-11, Vol.55 (11), p.2305-2318
Hauptverfasser: MONTREUIL, OLIVIER, MEROT, PHILIPPE, MARMONIER, PIERRE
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:1. Assessment of the role of landscape structures such as buffers is a necessary prerequisite for the sustainable management of water resources in an agricultural setting. 2. We monitored nitrate concentrations during interstorm periods at the outlet of 16 subcatchments of different orders within a catchment of 378 km². We characterised stream network, wetlands, agricultural practices and land cover and identified their relationships with nitrate fluxes and concentrations. 3. Two main factors controlled annual nitrate fluxes: the agricultural nitrogen surplus and the nature of the system comprising the wetland zone and adjoining watercourses. In the latter case, nitrate fluxes were reduced in proportion to the surface area of the riparian wetland and the flowpath distance of fluxes in the stream network. At the scale of the order-6 stream, 53% of annual nitrate flux during interstorm periods was removed during transfer via the wetland and the river, corresponding to 21.1 kg N ha⁻¹ per year. 4. The influence of the riparian wetland zone/watercourse system increased during periods of low water level, explaining up to 64% of nitrate concentration variation among locations within the river network, but only 9% during periods of high water level. 5. The buffering role was stronger at higher stream orders, and the dependence on stream order was more apparent at low water level, when we observed mean nitrate concentrations in the order-6 stream that were 47% lower than observed in order-2 or order-3 streams.
ISSN:0046-5070
1365-2427
DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02439.x