Outpatient management of cancer-associated pulmonary embolism: A post-hoc analysis from the HOME-PE trial

Cancer-related pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with poor prognosis. Some decision rules identifying patients eligible for home treatment categorize cancer patients at high risk of complications, precluding home treatment. We sought to assess the effectiveness and the safety of outpatient manag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thrombosis research 2024-03, Vol.235, p.79-87
Hauptverfasser: Chaibi, Sérine, Roy, Pierre-Marie, Guénégou, Armelle Arnoux, Tran, Yohann, Hugli, Olivier, Penaloza, Andréa, Couturaud, Francis, Tromeur, Cécile, Szwebel, Tali-Anne, Pernod, Gilles, Elias, Antoine, Ghuysen, Alexandre, Benhamou, Ygal, Falvo, Nicolas, Juchet, Henry, Nijkeuter, Mathilde, Mairuhu, Ronne, Faber, Laura M., Mahé, Isabelle, Montaclair, Karine, Planquette, Benjamin, Jimenez, David, Huisman, Menno V., Klok, Federikus A., Sanchez, Olivier
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Cancer-related pulmonary embolism (PE) is associated with poor prognosis. Some decision rules identifying patients eligible for home treatment categorize cancer patients at high risk of complications, precluding home treatment. We sought to assess the effectiveness and the safety of outpatient management of patients with low-risk cancer-associated PE. In the HOME-PE trial, hemodynamically stable patients with symptomatic PE were randomized to either triaging with Hestia criteria or sPESI score. We analyzed 3 groups of low-risk PE patients: 47 with active cancer treated at home (group 1), 691 without active cancer treated at home (group 2), and 33 with active cancer as the only sPESI criterion qualifying them for hospitalization (group 3). The main outcome was the composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and all-cause death within 30 days after randomization. Patients treated at home had composite outcome rates of 4.3 % (2/47) for those with cancer vs. 1.0 % (7/691) for those without (odds ratio (OR) 4.98, 95%CI 1.15–21.49). Patients with cancer had rates of complications of 4.3 % when treated at home vs. 3.0 % (1/33) when hospitalized (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.15–9.47). In multivariable analysis, active cancer was associated with an increased risk of complications for patients treated at home (OR 7.95; 95%CI 1.48–42.82). For patients with active cancer, home treatment was not associated with the primary outcome (OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.15–9.74). Among patients treated at home, active cancer was a risk factor for complications, but among patients with active cancer, home treatment was not associated with adverse outcomes. •Among patients with cancer-associated pulmonary embolism treated at home, the rate of adverse events was low.•Cancer patients treated at home and those qualified for hospitalization because of their cancer had similar rate of complications.•Patients treated at home had a higher rate of complications if they had an active cancer.•Home treatment of cancer-associated pulmonary embolism was not associated with adverse evolution.
ISSN:0049-3848
1879-2472
DOI:10.1016/j.thromres.2024.01.014