Assessment of membrane labelling mechanisms with exogenous fatty acids and detergents in bacteria
Labelling of bacterial membranes using exogenous fatty acids has proven to be a valuable tool to investigate molecular interactions by in-cell solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) spectroscopy, notably with antimicrobial peptides. However, the mechanism by which this labelling takes place...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Biochimie 2024-12, Vol.227 (Pt B), p.12-18 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Labelling of bacterial membranes using exogenous fatty acids has proven to be a valuable tool to investigate molecular interactions by in-cell solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (ssNMR) spectroscopy, notably with antimicrobial peptides. However, the mechanism by which this labelling takes place in non-mutated bacteria has not yet been investigated. In this work, we propose a rapid method to assess the fate of the fatty acids during the labelling of bacteria, involving two different methylation schemes and gas chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry. We applied this approach to Gram(+) and Gram(−) bacteria grown with deuterated palmitic acid under different conditions. We assessed the extent of labelling, then the resulting membrane rigidity by 2H ssNMR. Our results reveal that the labelling mechanism depends on the detergent used to micellize the fatty acids. This labelling can be either active or passive, whether the fatty acids are metabolized and used in the phospholipids biosynthesis, or remain unmodified in the membrane. We discuss the best labelling protocol for studying peptide-membrane interactions.
•Membrane labelling using fatty acids can occur through two different mechanisms.•GC-MS analysis allows the estimation of labelling efficiency and mechanism.•Detergent used to micellize the fatty acids influence the labelling mechanism.•Passive labelling is more efficient and results in a stiffer bacterial membrane.•The best labelling scheme for solid-state NMR studies uses Tween 20 as a detergent. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0300-9084 1638-6183 1638-6183 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.biochi.2024.05.024 |