DNA methylation as a new tool for the differential diagnosis between T‐LBL and lymphocyte‐rich thymoma

T‐lymphoblastic lymphoma (T‐LBL) and thymoma are two rare primary tumors of the thymus deriving either from T‐cell precursors or from thymic epithelial cells, respectively. Some thymoma subtypes (AB, B1, and B2) display numerous reactive terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐positive (TdT+) T‐cell p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of pathology 2024-11, Vol.264 (3), p.284-292
Hauptverfasser: Latiri, Mehdi, Belhocine, Mohamed, Smith, Charlotte, Garnier, Nathalie, Balducci, Estelle, Pinton, Antoine, Andrieu, Guillaume P, Bruneau, Julie, Spicuglia, Salvatore, Jamain, Stéphane, Latapie, Violaine, Montpreville, Vincent Thomas, Chalabreysse, Lara, Marx, Alexander, Girard, Nicolas, Besse, Benjamin, Plass, Christoph, Gibault, Laure, Badoual, Cécile, Macintyre, Elizabeth, Asnafi, Vahid, Molina, Thierry Jo, Touzart, Aurore
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:T‐lymphoblastic lymphoma (T‐LBL) and thymoma are two rare primary tumors of the thymus deriving either from T‐cell precursors or from thymic epithelial cells, respectively. Some thymoma subtypes (AB, B1, and B2) display numerous reactive terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase‐positive (TdT+) T‐cell precursors masking epithelial tumor cells. Therefore, the differential diagnosis between T‐LBL and TdT+ T‐lymphocyte‐rich thymoma could be challenging, especially in the case of needle biopsy. To distinguish between T‐LBL and thymoma‐associated lymphoid proliferations, we analyzed the global DNA methylation using two different technologies, namely MeDIP array and EPIC array, in independent samples series [17 T‐LBLs compared with one TdT+ lymphocyte‐rich thymoma (B1 subtype) and three normal thymi, and seven lymphocyte‐rich thymomas compared with 24 T‐LBLs, respectively]. In unsupervised principal component analysis (PCA), T‐LBL and thymoma samples clustered separately. We identified differentially methylated regions (DMRs) using MeDIP‐array and EPIC‐array datasets and nine overlapping genes between the two datasets considering the top 100 DMRs including ZIC1, TSHZ2, CDC42BPB, RBM24, C10orf53, and MACROD2. In order to explore the DNA methylation profiles in larger series, we defined a classifier based on these six differentially methylated gene promoters, developed an MS‐MLPA assay, and demonstrated a significant differential methylation between thymomas (hypomethylated; n = 48) and T‐LBLs (hypermethylated; n = 54) (methylation ratio median 0.03 versus 0.66, respectively; p 
ISSN:0022-3417
1096-9896
1096-9896
DOI:10.1002/path.6346