Stability of a continuous/discrete sensitivity model for the Navier–Stokes equations

This work presents a comprehensive framework for the sensitivity analysis of the Navier–Stokes equations, with an emphasis on the stability estimate of the discretized first‐order sensitivity of the Navier–Stokes equations. The first‐order sensitivity of the Navier–Stokes equations is defined using...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal for numerical methods in fluids 2024-12, Vol.96 (12), p.1883-1909
Hauptverfasser: Nouaime, N., Després, B., Puscas, M. A., Fiorini, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This work presents a comprehensive framework for the sensitivity analysis of the Navier–Stokes equations, with an emphasis on the stability estimate of the discretized first‐order sensitivity of the Navier–Stokes equations. The first‐order sensitivity of the Navier–Stokes equations is defined using the polynomial chaos method, and a finite element‐volume numerical scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations is suggested. This numerical method is integrated into the open‐source industrial code TrioCFD developed by the CEA. The finite element‐volume discretization is extended to the first‐order sensitivity Navier–Stokes equations, and the most significant and original point is the discretization of the nonlinear term. A stability estimate for continuous and discrete Navier–Stokes equations is established. Finally, numerical tests are presented to evaluate the polynomial chaos method and to compare it to the Monte Carlo and Taylor expansion methods. In this paper, the Intrusive Polynomial Chaos Method (IPCM) is used to compute the mean and variance of the model output. These values are then employed to determine the confidence intervals for the model output. This figure, compares the confidence intervals for (ux), ( uy), and (p) computed using the IPCM (in blue) and the Monte Carlo (MC) method (in hatched red) on the horizontal cross section (y = 0.2). For this test case, the IPCM results, obtained with only two simulations, are highly accurate and comparable to those of the Monte Carlo method, which requires 1300 simulations.
ISSN:0271-2091
1097-0363
DOI:10.1002/fld.5324