Modelling pyrolysis process for PP and HDPE inside thermogravimetric analyzer coupled with differential scanning calorimeter

•AHCM is used to model PE and PP melting process.•Pyrolysis process for PE and PP are described by a single reaction model.•Pyrolysis kinetics for PE and PP are determined using isoconversional methods.•PE and PP pyrolysis are simulated and validated at particle size scale.•The pre-cracking phenomen...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of heat and mass transfer 2021-09, Vol.176, p.121468, Article 121468
Hauptverfasser: Mazloum, Shawki, Aboumsallem, Youssef, Awad, Sary, Allam, Nadine, Loubar, Khaled
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•AHCM is used to model PE and PP melting process.•Pyrolysis process for PE and PP are described by a single reaction model.•Pyrolysis kinetics for PE and PP are determined using isoconversional methods.•PE and PP pyrolysis are simulated and validated at particle size scale.•The pre-cracking phenomenon is modeled to enhance further the results. Plastic pyrolysis is widely studied and implemented at lab-scale but rarely modelled numerically. For the sake of designing efficient industrial reactors, modelling plastic pyrolysis process at particle scale could be a prerequisite. Therefore, the aim of this work is to model the whole plastic pyrolysis process, on particle scale, for polypropylene (PP) and high density polyethylene (HDPE) inside a thermogravimetric analyzer coupled with differential scanning calorimeter (TGA-DSC). First, the kinetic triplet for PP and HDPE pyrolysis, at heating rates 4-10°C/min, are determined according to the isoconversional methods. Secondly, the kinetic triplets are used along with the appropriate conditions to model and simulate the pyrolysis process for PP and HDPE in TG analyzer, using finite element method. The melting sub-process is modelled using the modified apparent heat capacity method, which resulted in a relative error below 10% between the simulated and measured heat flow. Furthermore, the cracking model describes perfectly PP and HDPE cracking, where the average relative error among all calculated and experimental conversions didn't exceed 5%. Furthermore, the heat flow inside the TGA-DSC crucible was modelled and the average error was reduced to less than 8% by dividing the cracking phenomena into a “latent” and an apparent process.
ISSN:0017-9310
1879-2189
DOI:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2021.121468