Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the stomach in a Western population: peri-operative and 5-year oncological outcomes

Background This study compares the peri-operative and long-term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LSG) versus open subtotal gastrectomy (OSG) for adenocarcinoma of the stomach in a Western population. Methods A retrospective, intention-to-treat analysis study was conducted...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Surgical endoscopy 2020-09, Vol.34 (9), p.3818-3826
Hauptverfasser: Abbassi-Ghadi, Nima, Durakovic, Sanja, Piessen, Guillaume, Gatenby, Piers, Sultan, Javed, Preston, Shaun R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background This study compares the peri-operative and long-term oncological outcomes for laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy (LSG) versus open subtotal gastrectomy (OSG) for adenocarcinoma of the stomach in a Western population. Methods A retrospective, intention-to-treat analysis study was conducted for consecutive patients undergoing gastrectomy with curative intent for adenocarcinoma of the stomach between November 2006 and October 2016. Univariate analysis was used to compare peri-operative outcomes between LSG and OSG. Logistic regression with bootstrapping validation was used to identify independent risk factors for predicting 2-year overall survival. Results The final analysis included 79 patients. When comparing LSG ( n  = 30) to OSG ( n  = 49), there was no difference in the number of resected lymph nodes (36 (IQR 24.3–44) vs. 42 (IQR 28–59), p  = 0.165), a reduction in intra-operative blood loss (150 ml (IQR 100–250) vs. 553 ml (IQR 338–1075), p  
ISSN:0930-2794
1432-2218
DOI:10.1007/s00464-019-07146-6