An early post-transplant relapse prediction score in multiple myeloma: a large cohort study from the chronic malignancies working party of EBMT

Early relapse (ER) following Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (AHCT) confers a poor prognosis. We therefore developed a novel scoring system to predict ER. A total of 14,367 AHCT-1 patients were transplanted between 2014 and 2019, and were conditioned with Melphalan 200 mg/m 2 (Mel200)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Bone marrow transplantation (Basingstoke) 2023-08, Vol.58 (8), p.916-923
Hauptverfasser: Beksac, Meral, Iacobelli, Simona, Koster, Linda, Cornelissen, Jan, Griskevicius, Laimonas, Rabin, Neil K., Stoppa, Anne Marie, Meijer, Ellen, Mear, Jean-Baptiste, Zeerleder, Sacha, Mayer, Jiri, Fenk, Roland, Fegueux, Nathalie, Chevallier, Patrice, Konirova, Eva, Snowden, John A., Engelhardt, Monika, Orchard, Kim, Hulin, Cyrille, Schaap, Nicolaas, Sossa, Claudia, Elmaagacli, Ahmet, McLornan, Donal P., Hayden, Patrick J., Schönland, Stefan, Yakoub-Agha, Ibrahim
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Early relapse (ER) following Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation (AHCT) confers a poor prognosis. We therefore developed a novel scoring system to predict ER. A total of 14,367 AHCT-1 patients were transplanted between 2014 and 2019, and were conditioned with Melphalan 200 mg/m 2 (Mel200) ( n  = 7228; 2014–2017) (training cohort); Mel200 ( n  = 5616; 2018–2019) or Mel140 ( n  = 1523; 2018–2019) (validation cohorts). PFS-12 and the Cumulative Incidence of Relapse at 12 months were 84.1% and 14.7% (training Mel200), 87.2% and 11.6% (validation Mel200), and 80.3% and 16.9% (validation Mel140), respectively. The points in the risk score were: 0, 1,2 for ISS stages I, II, and III; Disease status: 0 (CR/VGPR); 1 (PR); 2 (SD/MR); 4 (Relapse/Progression); and 1 for Karnofsky ≤ 70. The distribution of scores: 0 (24%), 1 (33.9%), 2 (29.6 %), 3 (9.5%), and ≥4 (2.7%). The score separated PFS-12, with the lowest risk group ( n  = 1752) having a PFS-12 of 91.7% and the highest risk group ( n  = 195) 57.1%. This also applied in cytogenetically high-risk patients. If the pre-score baseline risks are 15% (standard risk) and 25% (high-risk), a score of ≥4 confers calculated risks of 38% and 54%, respectively. This novel EBMT ER score, therefore, allows for the identification of five discrete prognostic groups.
ISSN:0268-3369
1476-5365
DOI:10.1038/s41409-023-01999-1