The role of nanoceramic additives surface charge on the ionic transport of single lithium-ion conducting polymer electrolytes

In the context of designing solid polymer electrolytes for reliable, efficient, and durable lithium batteries, the present study was developed to have a better understanding of the role of the surface charge of ceramic nanoparticles, on the ionic transport used as additives in single lithium-ion con...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of solid state electrochemistry 2023-11, Vol.27 (11), p.2905-2915
Hauptverfasser: Guzmán-González, Gregorio, Avila-Paredes, Hugo J., Santos-Mendoza, Ilda
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In the context of designing solid polymer electrolytes for reliable, efficient, and durable lithium batteries, the present study was developed to have a better understanding of the role of the surface charge of ceramic nanoparticles, on the ionic transport used as additives in single lithium-ion conducting polymer electrolytes. A polymer based on sp 3 boron with polyethylene glycol (with an average Mn = 400 g mol −1 ) bridges was used as a model system; SiO 2 , ZrO 2, and TiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs), having a negative, neutral, and positive effective surface charge, respectively, were incorporated during synthesis. Samples were characterized by XRD and EIS; a DRT analysis of impedance spectra was also performed. The results obtained showed that the electrostatic interactions of Li + with the surface charge of nanoceramics resulted in an enhancement of 2.5% of ionic conductivity for the TiO 2 -containing polymer with respect to the electrolyte without NPs (due to repulsion between Li + and nanoceramics surface. The sample with ZrO 2 , compared to the NP-free polymer showed a similar conductivity and a decreased conductivity of 1.2% with respect to the NP-free polymer for the SiO 2 case (due to attraction between Li + and nanoceramics surface, that anchors Li + , hindering its transport). The pseudo-activation energy values (from VTF plots) indicated no change in the transport mechanism for all samples.
ISSN:1432-8488
1433-0768
DOI:10.1007/s10008-023-05563-1