Meniscal injuries in skeletally immature children with tibial eminence fractures. Systematic review of literature

Purpose Although the mechanisms of injury are similar to ACL rupture in adults, publications dealing with meniscal lesions resulting from fractures of the intercondylar eminence in children are much rarer. The main objective was to measure the frequency of meniscal lesions associated with tibial emi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International orthopaedics 2023-10, Vol.47 (10), p.2439-2448
Hauptverfasser: Severyns, Mathieu, Odri, Guillaume Anthony, Vendeuvre, Tanguy, Marchand, Jean-Baptiste, Germaneau, Arnaud, Dramé, Moustapha
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Purpose Although the mechanisms of injury are similar to ACL rupture in adults, publications dealing with meniscal lesions resulting from fractures of the intercondylar eminence in children are much rarer. The main objective was to measure the frequency of meniscal lesions associated with tibial eminence fractures in children. The second question was to determine whether there is any available evidence on association between meniscal tears diagnostic method, and frequencies of total lesions, total meniscal lesions, and total entrapments. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus. Articles were eligible for inclusion if they reported data on intercondylar tibial fracture, or tibial spine fracture, or tibial eminence fracture, or intercondylar eminence fracture. Article selection was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Results In total, 789 studies were identified by the literature search. At the end of the process, 26 studies were included in the final review. This systematic review identified 18.1% rate of meniscal tears and 20.1% rate of meniscal or IML entrapments during intercondylar eminence fractures. Proportion of total entrapments was significantly different between groups (17.8% in the arthroscopy group vs. 6.2% in the MRI group; p  
ISSN:0341-2695
1432-5195
DOI:10.1007/s00264-023-05787-w