Real-time monitoring of honeybee colony daily activity and bee loss rates can highlight the risk posed by a pesticide

Information on honeybee foraging performance and especially bee loss rates at the colony level are crucial for evaluating the magnitude of effects due to pesticide exposure, thereby ensuring that protection goals for honeybee colonies are met (i.e. threshold of acceptable effects). However, current...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Science of the total environment 2023-08, Vol.886, p.163928-163928, Article 163928
Hauptverfasser: Barascou, Lena, Godeau, Ugoline, Pioz, Maryline, Martin, Olivier, Sené, Deborah, Crauser, Didier, Le Conte, Yves, Alaux, Cedric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Information on honeybee foraging performance and especially bee loss rates at the colony level are crucial for evaluating the magnitude of effects due to pesticide exposure, thereby ensuring that protection goals for honeybee colonies are met (i.e. threshold of acceptable effects). However, current methods for monitoring honeybee foraging activity and mortality are very approximate (visual records) or are time-limited and mostly based on single cohort analysis. We therefore assess the potential of bee counters, that enable a colony-level and continuous monitoring of bee flight activity and mortality, in pesticide risk assessment. After assessing the background activity and bee loss rates, we exposed colonies to two concentrations of sulfoxaflor (a neurotoxic insecticide) in sugar syrup: a concentration that was considered to be field realistic (0.59 μg/ml) and a higher concentration (2.36 μg/ml) representing a worst-case exposure scenario. We did not find any effect of the field-realistic concentration on flight activity and bee loss rates. However, a two-fold decrease in daily flight activity and a 10-fold increase in daily bee losses were detected in colonies exposed to the highest sulfoxaflor concentration as compared to before exposure. When compared to the theoretical trigger values associated with the specific protection goal of 7 % colony-size reduction, the observed fold changes in daily bee losses were often found to be at risk for colonies. In conclusion, the real-time and colony-level monitoring of bee loss rates, combined with threshold values indicating at which levels bee loss rates threaten the colony, have great potential for improving regulatory pesticide risk assessments for honeybees under field conditions. [Display omitted] •We monitored the flight activity and bee loss rates of colonies exposed to sulfoxaflor.•No effect of the low concentration of sulfoxaflor (0.59 μg/ml) was detected.•The high concentration of sulfoxaflor (2.36 μg/ml) caused a 10-fold increase in daily bee losses.•The observed fold changes in daily bee losses were often found to be at risk for colonies.•Real-time data on honeybee mortality can improve pesticide risk assessment under field conditions.
ISSN:0048-9697
1879-1026
DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163928