Sleep timing, chronotype and social jetlag: Impact on cognitive abilities and psychiatric disorders

Circadian (C) and homeostatic (H) regulation of sleep timing inspired by [1] and [23] and modification of strength of external factors (arrow thickness) responsible for the circadian misalignment and consequences. [Display omitted] Sleep timing is controlled by the subtle interplay between circadian and homeostatic oscillators which, according to their endogenous properties, allow beings to feel spontaneously that it is time to go to bed or wake up in synchrony with the earth’s light/dark cycle. In humans, however, social time and nocturnal artificial light modify sleep timing. Our modern lifestyle and artificial nocturnal light delay our bedtime, make us wake up, and lead to a greater intraindividual variability in sleep timing. Depending on the constraints that social time places on us, our sleep timing may be in or out of phase with the internal circadian timing determined by the circadian clock. When a person’s social time is out of phase with their circadian time, they may be considered to suffer from circadian disruption or ‘social jetlag’. There are interindividual differences in sleep timing that are known as morningness-eveningness preferences or chronotype, e.g. late chronotypes go to bed later. Chronotype may be assessed in terms of differences in kinetic homeostatic sleep pressure, intrinsic circadian period (ICP) and/or phase angle entrainment. In addition, chronotype depends on genetic and age-related factors, e.g. it gets earlier as people grow older. The social time of late chronotype individuals during week days is not adapted to their circadian time, unlike on free days. This results in social jetlag and circadian disruption, which in turn induces a chronic sleep debt due to a late bedtime and an early wake time, which is compensated on free days but only partially. Sleep and circadian clock disruption generally alter cognitive performance (alertness, attention, memory, higher-order executive functions such as response inhibition and decision-making) but their impact remains to be clarified. When subjects adopt their preferred sleep timing, a “synchrony effect” often appears with chronotypes performing better during daytime at optimal than at suboptimal timing (late chronotypes perform better in the evening, early chronotypes in the morning). Evening types appear to be cognitively more vulnerable to suboptimal times than morning types, probably because they have to deal with social jetlag and the “wake effort” period after awakening. Circ