Negotiated windfalls: Mapping how public actors pursue and share land-value capture in Nanterre-la-Folie, France

This article seeks to broaden the scope of discussions pertaining to land-value capture (LVC). Scholars have now accumulated considerable documentation and analyses on how public authorities can (and whether they should) capture land-value increases that stem from actions other than the landowner’s. Little attention has been paid, however, to how public actors might compete for, and share the fruit of LVC. Using the case study of Nanterre-la-Folie, a district located in the vicinity of a new train station within the Grand Paris metropolitan area, we draw attention to the interplay of a variety of public actors (transit operators, local governments, national government) as they negotiate their share of transit-related LVC. In doing so, we show that the largely agreed-upon narrative of LVC as public actors versus private ones leaves important aspects of planning in a blind spot. By drawing attention to public actors’ competition for transit-related LVC, we inform academic debates on metropolitan governance and highlight implications for the unfolding and outcomes of real-estate projects. •Land-value capture (LVC) is often presented as opposing public and private actors.•LVC can however involve multiple public actors, with different agendas.•We analyse how several public actors negotiate to leverage LVC.•Understanding these negotiations sheds light on the planning process.•Ultimately, negotiations for LVC can change the shape of the real-estate project.