A comitative source for object markers in Sinitic languages: 跟kai 55 in Waxiang and 共kang 7 in Southern Min

This analysis sets out to specifically discuss the polyfunctionality of 跟 [kai 55 ] in Waxiang (Sinitic), whose lexical source is the verb 'to follow'. Amongst its various uses, we find a preposition 'with, along', a marker of adjuncts and a NP conjunction, thus superficially res...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of East Asian linguistics 2011-11, Vol.20 (4), p.291-338
Hauptverfasser: Chappell, Hilary, Peyraube, Alain, Wu, Yunji
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This analysis sets out to specifically discuss the polyfunctionality of 跟 [kai 55 ] in Waxiang (Sinitic), whose lexical source is the verb 'to follow'. Amongst its various uses, we find a preposition 'with, along', a marker of adjuncts and a NP conjunction, thus superficially resembling its Mandarin cognate 跟 gēn 'with'. Curiously, however, it has also evolved into a direct object marker in Waxiang, with a function similar to that of preposition 把 bă < 'hold, take' as found in the S-bă-O-VP or so-called 'disposal' form in standard Mandarin. The pathways of grammaticalization for 跟 [kai 55 ] in Waxiang are thus discussed in order to determine how it has developed this unusual grammatical function in one of the linguistic zones of China where verbs of giving or taking are, in fact, the main source for grammaticalized object markers in 'disposal' constructions. On the basis of 16 th and 17 th century Southern Min literature (Sinitic), a comparison is also made with analogous developments for comitative 共 go ng 'with' to provide support for our hypothesis that the direct object marking use has evolved from the oblique function of a benefactive or dative, and is clearly separate from the crosslinguistically well-attested pathway that leads to its use as a conjunction. We would thus like to propose that these data contribute a new pattern to the stock of grammaticalization pathways, specifically, comitative > dative/benefactive > accusative (direct object marker).
ISSN:0925-8558
1572-8560
DOI:10.1007/s10831-011-9078-z