Prediction of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a spontaneous Brugada type 1 pattern: the key is in the electrocardiogram

Abstract Aims There is currently no reliable tool to quantify the risks of ventricular fibrillation or sudden cardiac arrest (VF/SCA) in patients with spontaneous Brugada type 1 pattern (BrT1). Previous studies showed that electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of depolarization or repolarization disord...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Europace (London, England) England), 2019-09, Vol.21 (9), p.1400-1409
Hauptverfasser: Delinière, Antoine, Baranchuk, Adrian, Giai, Joris, Bessiere, Francis, Maucort-Boulch, Delphine, Defaye, Pascal, Marijon, Eloi, Le Vavasseur, Olivier, Dobreanu, Dan, Scridon, Alina, Da Costa, Antoine, Delacrétaz, Etienne, Kouakam, Claude, Eschalier, Romain, Extramiana, Fabrice, Leenhardt, Antoine, Burri, Haran, Winum, Pierre François, Taieb, Jérôme, Bouet, Jérôme, Fauvernier, Mathieu, Rosianu, Horia, Carabelli, Adrien, Duband, Benjamin, Chevalier, Philippe
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims There is currently no reliable tool to quantify the risks of ventricular fibrillation or sudden cardiac arrest (VF/SCA) in patients with spontaneous Brugada type 1 pattern (BrT1). Previous studies showed that electrocardiographic (ECG) markers of depolarization or repolarization disorders might indicate elevated risk. We aimed to design a VF/SCA risk prediction model based on ECG analyses for adult patients with spontaneous BrT1. Methods and results This retrospective multicentre international study analysed ECG data from 115 patients (mean age 45.1 ± 12.8 years, 105 males) with spontaneous BrT1. Of these, 45 patients had experienced VF/SCA and 70 patients did not experience VF/SCA. Among 10 ECG markers, a univariate analysis showed significant associations between VF/SCA and maximum corrected Tpeak–Tend intervals ≥100 ms in precordial leads (LMaxTpec) (P 
ISSN:1099-5129
1532-2092
DOI:10.1093/europace/euz156