First-principles calculation of interfacial stability, energy, electronic properties, ideal tensile strength and fracture toughness of SiC/BN interface
The interfacial properties and electronic structure of β -SiC (111)/ h -BN (0001), including work of adhesion ( W ad ), interface energy, bonding nature, ideal tensile strength and fracture toughness, were investigated using first-principles calculations. Eight interface models, with two different t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Applied physics. A, Materials science & processing Materials science & processing, 2021-02, Vol.127 (2), Article 125 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The interfacial properties and electronic structure of
β
-SiC (111)/
h
-BN (0001), including work of adhesion (
W
ad
), interface energy, bonding nature, ideal tensile strength and fracture toughness, were investigated using first-principles calculations. Eight interface models, with two different terminations and four stacking sites, were investigated. The
β
-SiC (111) slab, with 10 atomic layers, and the
h
-BN (0001) slab, with two atomic layers, exhibited bulk-like interior features, respectively. The Case II interface, in which the Si atom was located at the center of the B-N bond, had the largest work of adhesion (2.749 J/m
2
), the smallest interfacial distance (2.02 Å), the minimum interface energy (0.473 J/m
2
) and, thus, the best stability. The valence electron density and partial density of states indicated that there was a strong chemical and electrical interaction between the two sides of the Case II interface. The electronic structure analysis suggested that the interfacial bonding was mainly attributed to the Si-N ionic interaction and the valence electronic hybridization between Si-sp and B-sp. The ideal tensile strength and fracture toughness of the Case II interface were predicted as 13.26 GPa and 0.68–1.887 MPa•m
1/2
, respectively. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0947-8396 1432-0630 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00339-021-04289-z |