Adult brainstem glioma differential diagnoses: an MRI-based approach in a series of 68 patients

Background Brainstem gliomas are rare in adults. The diagnosis is often difficult, as some teams still consider brainstem biopsies dangerous and often avoid this procedure. The aim of this study was to describe differential diagnoses that can mimic brainstem glioma, to help clinicians avoid diagnost...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neurology 2022-08, Vol.269 (8), p.4349-4362
Hauptverfasser: Duran-Peña, Alberto, Ducray, François, Ramirez, Carole, Bauchet, Luc, Constans, Jean Marc, Grand, Sylvie, Guillamo, Jean Sébastien, Larrieu-Ciron, Delphine, Frappaz, Didier, Pyatigorskaya, Nadya, Savatovsky, Julien, Loiseau, Hugues, Duverneuil, Nadine Martin, Laigle-Donadey, Florence
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Brainstem gliomas are rare in adults. The diagnosis is often difficult, as some teams still consider brainstem biopsies dangerous and often avoid this procedure. The aim of this study was to describe differential diagnoses that can mimic brainstem glioma, to help clinicians avoid diagnostic and therapeutic mistakes, and to propose a diagnostic algorithm according to radiological presentations. Methods The French network of adult brainstem gliomas (GLITRAD) retrospectively collected all reported cases of differential diagnoses between 2006 and 2017. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age over 18 years, lesion epicenter in the brainstem, radiological pattern suggestive of a glioma and diagnostic confirmation (histopathological or not, depending on the disease). Results We identified a total of 68 cases. Most cases (58/68, 85%) presented as contrast-enhancing lesions. The most frequent final diagnosis in this group was metastases in 24/58 (41%), followed by central nervous system lymphoma in 8/58 (14%). Conversely, MRI findings revealed 10/68 nonenhancing lesions. The most frequent diagnosis in this group was demyelinating disease (3/10, 30%). Conclusion The risk of diagnostic mistakes illustrates the need to consider the more systematic use of a brainstem biopsy when reasonably possible. However, we propose an MRI-based approach to the differential diagnosis of gliomas to limit the risk of misdiagnosis in cases where a biopsy is not a reasonable option .
ISSN:0340-5354
1432-1459
DOI:10.1007/s00415-022-11070-6