Preponderance of additive and non-additive variances for growth, ecophysiological and wood traits in Eucalyptus hybrid genotype-by-spacing interaction

  The objective of this study was to better understand the underlying gene action in eucalyptus, under different plantation densities, for a different set of traits: growth, bark thickness, ecophysiological, and wood chemical property traits. We estimated the magnitude and relative proportion of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tree genetics & genomes 2022-08, Vol.18 (4), Article 32
Hauptverfasser: Makouanzi Ekomono, Chrissy Garel, Rambolarimanana, Tahina, Bouvet, Jean-Marc
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:  The objective of this study was to better understand the underlying gene action in eucalyptus, under different plantation densities, for a different set of traits: growth, bark thickness, ecophysiological, and wood chemical property traits. We estimated the magnitude and relative proportion of the various genetic variance components using a eucalyptus genotype by spacing (G × S) interaction experiment. A clonally replicated progeny test including 888 clones belonging to 64 full-sib families of Eucalyptus urophylla  ×  Eucalyptus grandis hybrid was used to estimate genetic parameters using genomic information to assess relationship matrix. Two densities (833 and 2500 trees/ha) were used representing contrasted environments in terms of individual tree available resource. Results showed that for height and circumference, additive-by-spacing (A × S) interaction variance increased from 18 to 55 months old, while dominance-by-spacing (D × S) interaction variance decreased. For bark thickness, specific leaf area, nitrogen, calcium, and magnesium, A × S interaction variance was preponderant. For wood chemical properties, except with Klason lignin, genetic additive effects strongly interacted with spacing compared to non-additive effects.
ISSN:1614-2942
1614-2950
DOI:10.1007/s11295-022-01563-w