Potential for Lung Recruitment Estimated by the Recruitment-to-Inflation Ratio in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. A Clinical Trial

Response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome depends on recruitability. We propose a bedside approach to estimate recruitability accounting for the presence of complete airway closure. To validate a single-breath method for measuring recruited volume and...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine 2020-01, Vol.201 (2), p.178-187
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Lu, Del Sorbo, Lorenzo, Grieco, Domenico L, Junhasavasdikul, Detajin, Rittayamai, Nuttapol, Soliman, Ibrahim, Sklar, Michael C, Rauseo, Michela, Ferguson, Niall D, Fan, Eddy, Richard, Jean-Christophe M, Brochard, Laurent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Response to positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in acute respiratory distress syndrome depends on recruitability. We propose a bedside approach to estimate recruitability accounting for the presence of complete airway closure. To validate a single-breath method for measuring recruited volume and test whether it differentiates patients with different responses to PEEP. Patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome were ventilated at 15 and 5 cm H O of PEEP. Multiple pressure-volume curves were compared with a single-breath technique. Abruptly releasing PEEP (from 15 to 5 cm H O) increases expired volume: the difference between this volume and the volume predicted by compliance at low PEEP (or above airway opening pressure) estimated the recruited volume by PEEP. This recruited volume divided by the effective pressure change gave the compliance of the recruited lung; the ratio of this compliance to the compliance at low PEEP gave the recruitment-to-inflation ratio. Response to PEEP was compared between high and low recruiters based on this ratio. Forty-five patients were enrolled. Four patients had airway closure higher than high PEEP, and thus recruitment could not be assessed. In others, recruited volume measured by the experimental and the reference methods were strongly correlated (  = 0.798;  
ISSN:1073-449X
1535-4970
DOI:10.1164/rccm.201902-0334oc