Association of serious adverse events with Cheyne–Stokes respiration characteristics in patients with systolic heart failure and central sleep apnoea: A SERVE‐Heart Failure substudy analysis

ABSTRACT Background and objective Increases in Cheyne–Stokes respiration (CSR) cycle length (CL), lung‐to‐periphery circulation time (LPCT) and time to peak flow (TTPF) may reflect impaired cardiac function. This retrospective analysis used an automatic algorithm to evaluate baseline CSR‐related fea...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) Vic.), 2020-03, Vol.25 (3), p.305-311
Hauptverfasser: Javed, Faizan, Tamisier, Renaud, Pepin, Jean‐Louis, Cowie, Martin R., Wegscheider, Karl, Angermann, Christiane, d'Ortho, Marie‐Pia, Erdmann, Erland, Simonds, Anita K., Somers, Virend K., Teschler, Helmut, Levy, Patrick, Armitstead, Jeff, Woehrle, Holger
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:ABSTRACT Background and objective Increases in Cheyne–Stokes respiration (CSR) cycle length (CL), lung‐to‐periphery circulation time (LPCT) and time to peak flow (TTPF) may reflect impaired cardiac function. This retrospective analysis used an automatic algorithm to evaluate baseline CSR‐related features and then determined whether these could be used to identify patients with systolic heart failure (HF) who experienced serious adverse events in the Treatment of Sleep‐Disordered Breathing with Predominant Central Sleep Apnea by Adaptive Servo Ventilation in Patients with Heart Failure (SERVE‐HF) substudy. Methods A total of 280 patients had overnight diagnostic polysomnography data available; an automated algorithm was applied to quantify CSR‐related features. Results Median baseline CL, LPCT and TTPF were similar in the control (n = 152) and adaptive servo‐ventilation (ASV, n = 156) groups. In both groups, CSR‐related features were significantly longer in patients who did (n = 129) versus did not (n = 140) experience a primary endpoint event (all‐cause death, life‐saving cardiovascular intervention or unplanned hospitalization for worsening HF): CL, 61.1 versus 55.1 s (P = 0.002); LPCT, 36.5 versus 31.5 s (P 
ISSN:1323-7799
1440-1843
DOI:10.1111/resp.13613