Judicial Opinions 103-111
In Opinion 103, the request to place the name Ehrenberg 1832 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied because a neotype may be designated. Similarly, because a neotype may be designated, in Opinion 104 the request to place the name Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958 (Approved Lists 198...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology 2022-01, Vol.72 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | In Opinion 103, the request to place the name
Ehrenberg 1832 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied because a neotype may be designated. Similarly, because a neotype may be designated, in Opinion 104 the request to place the name
Döbereiner and Ruschel 1958 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names is denied. In Opinion 105, it is emphasized that the name
Fukuda
. 2012 does not contravene the Code. The request to orthographically correct
Fukuda
. 2012 to
corrig. Fukuda
. 2012 is denied. Opinion 106 addresses two Requests for an Opinion and results in the placement of the epithet
in
(Morse 1912) Eberson 1918 (Approved Lists 1980) and
(Morse 1912) Kämpfer
. 2014 on the list of rejected specific and subspecific epithets. Since this removes all known available earlier synonyms of
(Magnusson 1923) Goodfellow and Alderson 1977 (Approved Lists 1980), the request to conserve the epithet
in this name is denied. In Opinion 107,
Phillips and Perry 1976 (Approved Lists 1980) is placed on the list of rejected names as a
. Opinion 108 denies the request to place
Weiner
. 2000 on the list of rejected names because the information provided to the Judicial Commission is not sufficient to draw a conclusion on this matter. In Opinion 109, which addresses three Requests for an Opinion, the Judicial Commission denies the requests to place the names
Shivaji
. 2006,
Shivaji
. 2006 and
Shivaji
. 2006 on the list of rejected names. Instead, it is concluded that these three names had not met the requirements for valid publication. Likewise, the Judicial Commission concludes in Opinion 110 that the name
corrig. Greub and Raoult 2006 had not met the requirements for valid publication. The Judicial Commission reaffirms in Opinion 111 that
Zellner
. 1988 is the nomenclatural type of
Zellner
. 1988 and further emphasizes that the species was not in danger of losing this status. These Opinions were ratified by the voting members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1466-5026 1466-5034 |
DOI: | 10.1099/ijsem.0.005197 |