Systematic review of randomised clinical trials and observational studies for patients with RAS wild-type or BRAF-mutant metastatic and/or unresectable colorectal cancer
Approximately 8-10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) tumours harbour BRAF mutations. Eleven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 24 non-RCTs were identified. Seven studies evaluated BRAF inhibitors. Single-agent BRAF inhibitors had minimal efficacy, whereas BRAF inhibitor plus anti-EGFR the...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Critical reviews in oncology/hematology 2022-05, Vol.173, p.103646, Article 103646 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Approximately 8-10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) tumours harbour BRAF mutations. Eleven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and 24 non-RCTs were identified. Seven studies evaluated BRAF inhibitors. Single-agent BRAF inhibitors had minimal efficacy, whereas BRAF inhibitor plus anti-EGFR therapy improved outcomes. In BEACON CRC, overall survival (OS) was significantly longer for patients receiving encorafenib plus cetuximab ± binimetinib when compared with irinotecan/FOLFIRI plus cetuximab as second- and third-line therapy. Seven prospective non-RCTs reported worse OS and progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with BRAF-mutant vs BRAF wild-type mCRC. Eight RCTs reported that PFS and OS were generally shorter for patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC vs those with KRAS or RAS wild-type mCRC. Patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC have worse outcomes with conventional therapy vs patients with BRAF wild-type tumours. BRAF inhibitors in conjunction with anti-EGFR therapy improves outcomes for patients with BRAF-mutant mCRC vs conventional therapy or a BRAF inhibitor alone. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1040-8428 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103646 |