Analyzing central-line associated bloodstream infection prevention bundles in 22 countries: The results of ID-IRI survey
•Forty-three participants from 22 countries (46 hospitals, 85 intensive care units) responded to the survey.•Eight (17.4%) hospitals had no surveillance system for CLABSI.•Approximately 7.1 % (n = 6) had no CLABSI bundle and twenty intensive care units (23.5%) had no dedicated checklist.•The proport...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of infection control 2022-12, Vol.50 (12), p.1327-1332 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | •Forty-three participants from 22 countries (46 hospitals, 85 intensive care units) responded to the survey.•Eight (17.4%) hospitals had no surveillance system for CLABSI.•Approximately 7.1 % (n = 6) had no CLABSI bundle and twenty intensive care units (23.5%) had no dedicated checklist.•The proportion of using ultrasonography during catheter insertion, transparent semi-permeable dressings, needleless connectors and single-use sterile pre-filled ready to use 0.9% NaCl were significantly higher in higher and middle higher countries.
Because central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs) are a significant complication of central venous access, it is critical to prevent CLABSIs through the use of central line bundles. The purpose of this study was to take a snapshot of central venous access bundles in various countries.
The participants in intensive care units (ICUs) completed a questionnaire that included information about the health center, infection control procedures, and central line maintenance. The countries were divided into 2 groups: those with a low or low-middle income and those with an upper-middle or high income.
Forty-three participants from 22 countries (46 hospitals, 85 ICUs) responded to the survey. Eight (17.4%) hospitals had no surveillance system for CLABSI. Approximately 7.1 % (n = 6) ICUs had no CLABSI bundle. Twenty ICUs (23.5%) had no dedicated checklist. The percentage of using ultrasonography during catheter insertion, transparent semi-permeable dressings, needleless connectors and single-use sterile pre-filled ready to use 0.9% NaCl were significantly higher in countries with higher and middle-higher income (P < .05).
Our study demonstrated that there are significant differences in the central line bundles between low/low-middle income countries and upper-middle/high-income countries. Additional measures should be taken to address inequity in the management of vascular access in resource-limited countries. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0196-6553 1527-3296 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ajic.2022.02.031 |