Reply to Commentary on "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure", Plasma Research Express, 2 (2020) 025014

This is a Reply to the Comment of Dozias S., Pouvesle J.-M. and Robert E. on the paper "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure'". The criticism in the Comment, namely that the measurements and the subsequent interpretations are wrong, seem...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Plasma Research Express 2022-04, Vol.4 (1)
1. Verfasser: Iséni, Sylvain
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:This is a Reply to the Comment of Dozias S., Pouvesle J.-M. and Robert E. on the paper "Mapping the electric field vector of guided ionization waves at atmospheric pressure'". The criticism in the Comment, namely that the measurements and the subsequent interpretations are wrong, seems to be invalid. Additional information will be detailed to discuss the point of view of the authors. However, the criticism raises an interesting comparison of two data sets presented in a normalized color scale. The resulting figure clearly supports the argument that the plasma-induced electric field measurements are consistent and validates the experimental investigation.
ISSN:2516-1067
2516-1067
DOI:10.1088/2516-1067/ac61c2