Role of the general practitioner in the care of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers: General practitioner and patient perspectives

Background: General practitioners (GPs) have an increasing role in referring patients with putative mutation in BRCA1/2 genes for genetics consultation and for long-term follow-up of mutation carriers. Methods: We compared the expectations of the GPs' role according to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Molecular genetics & genomic medicine 2018, Vol.6, p.957-965
Hauptverfasser: Vande Perre, Pierre, Toledano, Daniel, Corsini, Carole, Escriba, Elsa, Laporte, Marine, Bertet, Helena, Yauy, Kevin, Toledano, Alain, Galibert, Virginie, Baudry, Karen, Clotet, Lucie, Million, Elodie, Picot, Marie-Christine, Geneviève, David, Pujol, Pascal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: General practitioners (GPs) have an increasing role in referring patients with putative mutation in BRCA1/2 genes for genetics consultation and for long-term follow-up of mutation carriers. Methods: We compared the expectations of the GPs' role according to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and to GPs themselves. Results: Overall, 38% (58/152) of eligible GPs and 70% (176/252) of eligible patients were surveyed. Although 81% of GPs collected the family history, only 24% considered that they know criteria indicating genetics consultation and 39% sufficient knowledge of BRCA1/2 guidelines to answer patients' questions. Twelve% of GPs were aware of the French national guidelines. Among unsatisfied patients, 40% felt that their GP was able to answer (moderately, sufficiently, or completely) specific questions about BRCA1/2 care as compared with 81% in satisfied patients. Only 33% of GPs reported being informed directly by the geneticist about the patients' results. GPs' main expectations for their role in BRCA1/2 carrier care were psychological support and informing relatives about screening (72% and 71%, respectively), which contrasts with the perceptions of patients, who mainly requested medical advice for BRCA1/2-related care (51%).
ISSN:2324-9269
DOI:10.1002/mgg3.464