Association of Anti–Programmed Cell Death 1 Antibody Treatment With Risk of Recurrence of Toxic Effects After Immune-Related Adverse Events of Ipilimumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma

IMPORTANCE: Since 2011, many patients with metastatic melanoma have been treated with ipilimumab therapy and have developed severe immune-related adverse events (AEs). Because several immune therapies are now available to treat metastatic melanoma, a better knowledge of mechanisms and recurrence ris...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of dermatology (1960) 2020-09, Vol.156 (9), p.982-986
Hauptverfasser: Brunot, Angélique, Grob, Jean-Jacques, Jeudy, Geraldine, Grange, Florent, Guillot, Bernard, Kramkimel, Nora, Mortier, Laurent, Le Corre, Yannick, Aubin, François F, Mansard, Sandrine, Lebbé, Céleste, Blom, Astrid, Montaudie, Henri, Giacchero, Damien, Prey, Sorilla, Legoupil, Delphine, Guyot, Alexis, Amini-adle, Mona, Granel-Brocard, Florence, Meyer, Nicolas, Dinulescu, Monica, Edeline, Julien, Campillo-Gimenez, Boris, Lesimple, Thierry
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:IMPORTANCE: Since 2011, many patients with metastatic melanoma have been treated with ipilimumab therapy and have developed severe immune-related adverse events (AEs). Because several immune therapies are now available to treat metastatic melanoma, a better knowledge of mechanisms and recurrence risks of immune-related AEs is needed before reintroduction of immunotherapies. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the risk of a recurrence of immune toxic effects associated with anti–programmed cell death 1 antibody (anti–PD-1) therapy after discontinuation of ipilimumab monotherapy because of severe AEs. DESIGN, SETTINGS, AND PARTICIPANTS: This cohort study conducted at 19 French melanoma referral centers included patients with metastatic melanoma who experienced severe immune-related AEs after ipilimumab therapy and then were treated with anti–PD-1 therapy between February 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. The study cutoff was June 1, 2017. Statistical analysis was performed from June 1, 2016, to August 31, 2017. EXPOSURES: Monotherapy with at least 1 cycle of ipilimumab that was associated with a grade 3 or 4 immune-related AE and subsequent treatment with at least 1 cycle of an anti–PD-1 (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the rate of immune-related AEs associated with anti–PD-1 therapy. Secondary outcomes were characteristics of ipilimumab-related and anti–PD-1 immune–related AEs and overall response rate and overall survival associated with anti–PD-1 therapy. RESULTS: Of 56 patients with metastatic melanoma included in the study, all of whom experienced severe immune-related AEs after ipilimumab therapy (31 [55%] male; mean [SD] age, 64 [14.9] years), 20 (36%) experienced at least 1 immune-related AE associated with pembrolizumab (6 of 20 [30%]) or nivolumab (14 of 20 [70%]) therapy. A total of 12 patients (21%) experienced grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs, and among these patients, 4 (33%) presented with the same immune-related AE as with ipilimumab therapy. Severe immune-related AEs were resolved with use of systemic corticosteroids (7 [58%]) and/or anti–tumor necrosis factor (1 [8%]), and no grade 5 toxic effects were reported. Five patients discontinued anti–PD-1 therapy because of immune-related AEs. The overall response rate was 43%, with a median overall survival of 21 months (interquartile range, 18 to ongoing). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The findings suggest that anti–PD-1 therapy may be associated with reduc
ISSN:2168-6068
2168-6084
DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2020.2149