Cyclostratigraphy and Magnetostratigraphy of the Middle Miocene Ashigong Formation, Guide Basin, China, and Its Implications for the Paleoclimatic Evolution of NE Tibet

Recent tectonostratigraphy studies have shown that Northeast Tibet underwent significant tectonic uplift and basin partitioning at 13–8 Ma. This time window is also a period of significant changes in Asian monsoonal intensity, mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Though many studies have tr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Paleoceanography and Paleoclimatology 2018-10, Vol.33 (10), p.1066-1085
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Zhixiang, Shen, Yongjin, Licht, Alexis, Huang, Chunju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Recent tectonostratigraphy studies have shown that Northeast Tibet underwent significant tectonic uplift and basin partitioning at 13–8 Ma. This time window is also a period of significant changes in Asian monsoonal intensity, mechanisms of which remain poorly understood. Though many studies have tried to decipher paleoclimatic trends from sedimentary archives in Northeast Tibetan basins, it is often hard to distinguish local orographic effects from regional climate changes in such a tectonically active context. Here we investigated the sedimentary record of the Ashigong Formation, Guide Basin, in order to better constrain the Tibetan paleoenvironmental evolution and link it to uplift episodes and monsoonal evolution. By studying the lithology, magnetostratigraphy, redness, magnetic susceptibility, and elemental content of a ~500‐m section, we show that the Ashigong Formation was deposited in a saline paleolake between 14.4 and 10 Ma. Lake expansion displayed cyclic variations following ~100‐kyr cycles and weaker ~41‐kyr cycles, reaching its maximum between ~11.4 and 10.5 Ma. Our results show that the Guide Basin was hydrologically closed from most of the middle Miocene, confirming previous studies that proposed an early Miocene partitioning of this basin. The maximum lake expansion between 11.4 and 10.5 Ma is coeval to a known peak of monsoonal intensity. This, and the evidence for a strong orbital control on lake expansion, supports a strong monsoonal control on the expansion of middle Miocene Tibet paleolakes. The origin of the ~100‐kyr forcing on monsoonal moisture supply—different from Quaternary forcing—questions the climatic mechanism of these middle Miocene monsoons and suggests that westerly derived moisture might have also significantly contributed to the regional hydrological budget. Key Points The Guide Basin was a hydrologically closed lake from at least 14.4 to 10 Ma that attained a maximum extent between ~11.4 and 10.5 Ma Maximum lake expansion was coeval to a known peak of monsoonal intensity Lake expansion displayed cyclic variations following ~100‐kyr orbital cycles and weaker ~41‐kyr cycles
ISSN:2572-4517
2572-4525
2572-4525
1944-9186
DOI:10.1029/2018PA003409