Acquisition experience and director remuneration

•Acquisition experience of directors generates a contractual premium.•The relative size of the premium is higher for non-executive directors than for executives.•Only a director’s track record related to past successful acquisitions receives a premium.•This premium declines if directors are in firms...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international financial markets, institutions & money institutions & money, 2021-11, Vol.75, p.101356, Article 101356
Hauptverfasser: Birhanu, Addis Gedefaw, Geiler, Philipp, Renneboog, Luc, Zhao, Yang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Acquisition experience of directors generates a contractual premium.•The relative size of the premium is higher for non-executive directors than for executives.•Only a director’s track record related to past successful acquisitions receives a premium.•This premium declines if directors are in firms with rich acquisition exeprience. We investigate whether acquisition experience of executive and non-executive directors is priced in their remuneration contracts. Acquisition experience generates a contractual premium, and the relative size of this premium is higher for non-executive directors than for executives. Only a director’s track record related to past successful acquisitions is priced. Acquisition experience of a director is not remunerated if this type of experience is already abundantly present in the firm through the firm’s past acquisition record (substitution effect). We verify the results by examining potential endogeneity concerns, by analyzing a broad set of measures of acquisition experience (such as industry-specific, broad or international experience, experience on a target’s board), and by ruling out alternative explanations (such as a director’s general skills level or reputation, the CEO’s power and delegation attitude, and the firm’s corporate governance quality).
ISSN:1042-4431
1873-0612
DOI:10.1016/j.intfin.2021.101356