Are entheseal changes and cross‐sectional properties associated with the shape of the upper limb?
Objectives Reconstruction of the activity of past human populations can be carried out using various skeletal markers; however, the relationship between these methods is not fully understood. Therefore, the main aim of this article is to analyze the relationship between entheseal changes, cross‐sect...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | American journal of physical anthropology 2020-10, Vol.173 (2), p.293-306 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objectives
Reconstruction of the activity of past human populations can be carried out using various skeletal markers; however, the relationship between these methods is not fully understood. Therefore, the main aim of this article is to analyze the relationship between entheseal changes, cross‐sectional properties, and variability in the shape of the upper limb.
Materials and methods
The analyzed material consisted of CT images of 71 right scapulae, humeri, and ulnae belonging to the same individuals from a mediaeval population located in Poland. For each series of bones for the same individual, skeletal markers such as: cross‐sectional properties, entheses and shape variation were assessed. Next, correlations between these three skeletal indicators were calculated.
Results
In general, the models showed that only sex influences entheses. Multivariate regression revealed significant correlation only between ulnar auricular surface shape and two types of mean score for entheses.
Discussion
The findings are inconsistent and stand in contradiction to other research; therefore, we suggest that an assessment of individual activity should be carried out, using as many post‐cranial elements as possible and a variety of methods. This approach will ensure more accurate reconstruction of the activity levels and patterns of archeological groups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0002-9483 1096-8644 2692-7691 |
DOI: | 10.1002/ajpa.24096 |