The consolidated European synthesis of CO2 emissions and removals for the European Union and United Kingdom: 1990-2018

Reliable quantification of the sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), including that of their trends and uncertainties, is essential to monitoring the progress in mitigating anthropogenic emissions under the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. This study provides a consolidated s...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Earth system science data 2021-05, Vol.13 (5), p.2363-2406
Hauptverfasser: Petrescu, Ana Maria Roxana, McGrath, Matthew J., Andrew, Robbie M., Peylin, Philippe, Peters, Glen P., Ciais, Philippe, Broquet, Gregoire, Tubiello, Francesco N., Gerbig, Christoph, Pongratz, Julia, Janssens-Maenhout, Greet, Grassi, Giacomo, Nabuurs, Gert-Jan, Regnier, Pierre, Lauerwald, Ronny, Kuhnert, Matthias, Balkovic, Juraj, Schelhaas, Mart-Jan, van der Gon, Hugo A. C. Denier, Solazzo, Efisio, Qiu, Chunjing, Pilli, Roberto, Konovalov, Igor B., Houghton, Richard A., Guenther, Dirk, Perugini, Lucia, Crippa, Monica, Ganzenmueller, Raphael, Luijkx, Ingrid T., Smith, Pete, Munassar, Saqr, Thompson, Rona L., Conchedda, Giulia, Monteil, Guillaume, Scholze, Marko, Karstens, Ute, Brockmann, Patrick, Dolman, Albertus Johannes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Reliable quantification of the sources and sinks of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2), including that of their trends and uncertainties, is essential to monitoring the progress in mitigating anthropogenic emissions under the Kyoto Protocol and the Paris Agreement. This study provides a consolidated synthesis of estimates for all anthropogenic and natural sources and sinks of CO2 for the European Union and UK (EU27 + UK), derived from a combination of state-of-the-art bottom-up (BU) and top-down (TD) data sources and models. Given the wide scope of the work and the variety of datasets involved, this study focuses on identifying essential questions which need to be answered to properly understand the differences between various datasets, in particular with regards to the less-well-characterized fluxes from managed ecosystems. The work integrates recent emission inventory data, process-based ecosystem model results, data-driven sector model results and inverse modeling estimates over the period 1990-2018. BU and TD products are compared with European national greenhouse gas inventories (NGHGIs) reported under the UNFCCC in 2019, aiming to assess and understand the differences between approaches. For the uncertainties in NGHGIs, we used the standard deviation obtained by varying parameters of inventory calculations, reported by the member states following the IPCC Guidelines. Variation in estimates produced with other methods, like atmospheric inversion models (TD) or spatially disaggregated inventory datasets (BU), arises from diverse sources including within-model uncertainty related to parameterization as well as structural differences between models. In comparing NGHGIs with other approaches, a key source of uncertainty is that related to different system boundaries and emission categories (CO2 fossil) and the use of different land use definitions for reporting emissions from land use, land use change and forestry (LULUCF) activities (CO2 land). At the EU27 + UK level, the NGHGI (2019) fossil CO2 emissions (including cement production) account for 2624 TgCO(2) in 2014 while all the other seven bottom-up sources are consistent with the NGHGIs and report a mean of 2588 ( +/- 463 TgCO(2)). The inversion reports 2700 TgCO(2) ( +/- 480 TgCO(2)), which is well in line with the national inventories. Over 2011-2015, the CO2 land sources and sinks from NGHGI estimates report 90 TgC yr(-1) +/- 30 TgC yr(-1) while all other BU approaches report a mean sink of 98 TgC y
ISSN:1866-3508
1866-3516
DOI:10.5194/essd-13-2363-2021