Carotid versus femoral access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: comparable results in the current era

Abstract   OBJECTIVES The carotid approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to be feasible and safe. The goal of this study was to compare the 30-day outcomes of trans-carotid (TC) and transfemoral (TF) TAVR. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 500 consecutive p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery 2021-10, Vol.60 (4), p.874-879
Hauptverfasser: Marie, Basile, David, Charles Henri, Guimbretière, Guillaume, Foucher, Yohann, Buschiazzo, Antoine, Letocart, Vincent, Manigold, Thibaut, Plessis, Julien, Jaafar, Philippe, Morin, Hélène, Rozec, Bertrand, Roussel, Jean Christian, Sénage, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract   OBJECTIVES The carotid approach for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been shown to be feasible and safe. The goal of this study was to compare the 30-day outcomes of trans-carotid (TC) and transfemoral (TF) TAVR. METHODS This retrospective study enrolled 500 consecutive patients treated by TC-TAVR (n = 100) or TF-TAVR (n = 400) with percutaneous closure between January 2018 and January 2020 at the Nantes University Hospital. The primary end-point was the occurrence of cardiovascular death and cerebrovascular events at 30 days. RESULTS The mean age was 79.9 ± 8.1 in the TC group and 81.3 ± 6.9 (P = 0.069) in the TF group. The TC group had more men (69% vs 50.5%; P = 0.001) and more patients with peripheral vascular disease (86% vs 14.8%; P 
ISSN:1010-7940
1873-734X
DOI:10.1093/ejcts/ezab109