Imaging Work-Up for Screening of Paraganglioma and Pheochromocytoma in SDHx Mutation Carriers: A Multicenter Prospective Study from the PGL.EVA Investigators

Context: Recommendations have not been established concerning imaging to screen SDHx mutation carriers for paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. Objective: Our objective was to compare the performance of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and [12...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 2013-01, Vol.98 (1), p.E162-E173
Hauptverfasser: Gimenez-Roqueplo, Anne-Paule, Caumont-Prim, Aurore, Houzard, Claire, Hignette, Chantal, Hernigou, Anne, Halimi, Philippe, Niccoli, Patricia, Leboulleux, Sophie, Amar, Laurence, Borson-Chazot, Françoise, Cardot-Bauters, Catherine, Delemer, Brigitte, Chabolle, Frédéric, Coupier, Isabelle, Libé, Rossella, Peitzsch, Mirko, Peyrard, Séverine, Tenenbaum, Florence, Plouin, Pierre-François, Chatellier, Gilles, Rohmer, Vincent
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Context: Recommendations have not been established concerning imaging to screen SDHx mutation carriers for paraganglioma and pheochromocytoma. Objective: Our objective was to compare the performance of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, contrast-enhanced computed tomography, and [123I]metaiodo-benzylguanidine and somatostatin receptor scintigraphies for detecting head and neck and thoracic-abdominal-pelvic paragangliomas in SDHx mutation carriers. Design and Setting: We conducted a prospective, multicenter study from June 2005 to December 2009 at 23 French medical centers. Patients: A total of 238 index cases or relatives carrying mutations in SDHD, SDHB, or SDHC genes were included. Intervention: Images obtained by each technique were analyzed blind, without knowledge of results from other tests, first in each local center and then centrally. Main Outcome Measures: We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios for individual and combinations of tests, the gold standard being the consensus of an expert committee. Results: Two hundred two tumors were diagnosed in 96 subjects. At local assessment, the sensitivity of anatomical imaging for detecting all tumors was higher (85.7%) than that of both scintigraphic techniques (42.7% for [123I]metaiodo-benzylguanidine and 69.5% for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy), except for thoracic localizations where somatostatin receptor scintigraphy was more sensitive (61.5 vs. 46.2% for anatomical imaging and 30.8% for [123I]metaiodo-benzylguanidine scintigraphy). The best diagnostic performance during local assessment was obtained by combining anatomical imaging tests and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (sensitivity 91.7%). Central assessment significantly increased the sensitivity (98.6%) of tests in combination. Conclusions: In routine practice, the imaging work-up for screening SDHx mutation carriers should include thoraco-abdomino-pelvic computed tomography, head and neck magnetic angiography, and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy. Expert centralized image assessment is recommended.
ISSN:0021-972X
1945-7197
DOI:10.1210/jc.2012-2975