The trunk’s contribution to postural control under challenging balance conditions

•Trunk control is essential for athletes during specific challenging balance tasks.•Trunk motion predicts center of force sway path.•The trunk is more important than knee and hip joints during specific balance tasks. The double inverted pendulum model is imprecise when applied to studies of postural...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gait & posture 2021-02, Vol.84, p.102-107
Hauptverfasser: Duchene, Youri, Mornieux, Guillaume, Petel, Arthur, Perrin, Philippe P., Gauchard, Gérome C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•Trunk control is essential for athletes during specific challenging balance tasks.•Trunk motion predicts center of force sway path.•The trunk is more important than knee and hip joints during specific balance tasks. The double inverted pendulum model is imprecise when applied to studies of postural control. Although multijoint analyses have improved our understanding of how balance is maintained, the exact role of the trunk remains unclear. What is the trunk’s contribution in postural control with respect to the other joints and how do trunk muscles control trunk kinematics? Thirty-six healthy athletes (handball, karate, long jump) performed a highly challenging balance task while the ground support was dynamically tilted in the sagittal plane. The center of force (CoF) as well as lower limb joint angles and the trunk-pelvis angle were respectively measured with a force platform and inertial measurement units. The amplitude, sway path and standard deviation of the CoF and the joint angles were then calculated. Electromyography was used to record the activity of the rectus abdominis, external obliquus, and erector spinae muscles. Multiple linear regressions were computed to determine the joints’ and muscles’ contributions (β-coefficients) in predicting CoF variables and trunk kinematics, respectively. The linear combination of joint kinematic variables accounted for between 33 % and 75 % of the variance in the CoF. The ankle had the highestβ and was a significant predictor of all CoF variables. The trunk yielded the second highest β-coefficient and was a significant predictor of the CoF sway path. Electromyography variables accounted for no more than 35 % of the variance in the trunk kinematics, and erector spinae activity was the only significant predictor. The trunk appears to be the second most important element during this specific postural task, in the magnitude of body sway in particular. But neuromuscular control of these trunk processes is difficult to characterize with surface electromyography only. The trunk should be taken into account when seeking to improve overall postural control (e.g. during training, rehabilitation).
ISSN:0966-6362
1879-2219
DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2020.11.020