OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine
Phase I of the OC6 project is focused on examining why offshore wind design tools underpredict the response (loads/motion) of the OC5-DeepCwind semisubmersible at its surge and pitch natural frequencies. Previous investigations showed that the underprediction was primarily related to nonlinear hydro...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of physics. Conference series 2020-09, Vol.1618 (3), p.32033 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 32033 |
container_title | Journal of physics. Conference series |
container_volume | 1618 |
creator | Robertson, A N Gueydon, S Bachynski, E Wang, L Jonkman, J Alarcón, D Amet, E Beardsell, A Bonnet, P Boudet, B Brun, C Chen, Z Féron, M Forbush, D Galinos, C Galvan, J Gilbert, P Gómez, J Harnois, V Haudin, F Hu, Z Dreff, J Le Leimeister, M Lemmer, F Li, H Mckinnon, G Mendikoa, I Moghtadaei, A Netzband, S Oh, S Pegalajar-Jurado, A Nguyen, M Q Ruehl, K Schünemann, P Shi, W Shin, H Si, Y Surmont, F Trubat, P Qwist, J Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S |
description | Phase I of the OC6 project is focused on examining why offshore wind design tools underpredict the response (loads/motion) of the OC5-DeepCwind semisubmersible at its surge and pitch natural frequencies. Previous investigations showed that the underprediction was primarily related to nonlinear hydrodynamic loading, so two new validation campaigns were performed to separately examine the different hydrodynamic load components. In this paper, we validate a variety of tools against this new test data, focusing on the ability to accurately model the low-frequency loads on a semisubmersible floater when held fixed under wave excitation and when forced to oscillate in the surge direction. However, it is observed that models providing better load predictions in these two scenarios do not necessarily produce a more accurate motion response in a moored configuration. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032033 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03007787v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_03007787v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed8a298d6f598466784716eec9f791c2b52642dfac7cc2cddc6356182204a7f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkd1LHDEUxYeiUD_6NzT0zcJ08zGTZPomS1u3LCiozyEmN05kTabJrLL0n2_GkQWhDz7lkvM7F-45VfWZ4G8ES7kgoqE1bzu-IJzIBVtgRjFjH6qjvXKwn6X8WB3n_IALwZg4qv5eLjm66nUGtPqOVuEJ8ujv9ejDPRp7QNtgIQ0JrDejjwFFhzbxuXYJ_mwhmB3qdzZFuwv60ZsiaZuRDhYlyEMMGfLk0MgV5WXnsy_iuE13PsBpdej0JsOn1_ekuv3542Z5Ua8vf62W5-vaNA0fa7BS005a7tpONpwL2QjCAUznREcMvWspb6h12ghjqLHWcNaWKCjFjRaOsZPqy7w3lttUNn4E05sYAphRES4waUmBzmao1xs1JP-o005F7dXF-VpNf5hhLIQUTxMrZtakmHMCtzcQrKZS1BS3mqJXUymKqbmU4mSz08dBPcRtCuXwd7i-_sf1-2p5_RZUg3XsH6fonKA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine</title><source>IOP Publishing Free Content</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>IOPscience extra</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Robertson, A N ; Gueydon, S ; Bachynski, E ; Wang, L ; Jonkman, J ; Alarcón, D ; Amet, E ; Beardsell, A ; Bonnet, P ; Boudet, B ; Brun, C ; Chen, Z ; Féron, M ; Forbush, D ; Galinos, C ; Galvan, J ; Gilbert, P ; Gómez, J ; Harnois, V ; Haudin, F ; Hu, Z ; Dreff, J Le ; Leimeister, M ; Lemmer, F ; Li, H ; Mckinnon, G ; Mendikoa, I ; Moghtadaei, A ; Netzband, S ; Oh, S ; Pegalajar-Jurado, A ; Nguyen, M Q ; Ruehl, K ; Schünemann, P ; Shi, W ; Shin, H ; Si, Y ; Surmont, F ; Trubat, P ; Qwist, J ; Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S</creator><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A N ; Gueydon, S ; Bachynski, E ; Wang, L ; Jonkman, J ; Alarcón, D ; Amet, E ; Beardsell, A ; Bonnet, P ; Boudet, B ; Brun, C ; Chen, Z ; Féron, M ; Forbush, D ; Galinos, C ; Galvan, J ; Gilbert, P ; Gómez, J ; Harnois, V ; Haudin, F ; Hu, Z ; Dreff, J Le ; Leimeister, M ; Lemmer, F ; Li, H ; Mckinnon, G ; Mendikoa, I ; Moghtadaei, A ; Netzband, S ; Oh, S ; Pegalajar-Jurado, A ; Nguyen, M Q ; Ruehl, K ; Schünemann, P ; Shi, W ; Shin, H ; Si, Y ; Surmont, F ; Trubat, P ; Qwist, J ; Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S ; National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Phase I of the OC6 project is focused on examining why offshore wind design tools underpredict the response (loads/motion) of the OC5-DeepCwind semisubmersible at its surge and pitch natural frequencies. Previous investigations showed that the underprediction was primarily related to nonlinear hydrodynamic loading, so two new validation campaigns were performed to separately examine the different hydrodynamic load components. In this paper, we validate a variety of tools against this new test data, focusing on the ability to accurately model the low-frequency loads on a semisubmersible floater when held fixed under wave excitation and when forced to oscillate in the surge direction. However, it is observed that models providing better load predictions in these two scenarios do not necessarily produce a more accurate motion response in a moored configuration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032033</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Environmental Engineering ; Environmental Sciences ; hydrodynamic loads ; offshore wind ; WIND ENERGY</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2020-09, Vol.1618 (3), p.32033</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>Attribution</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed8a298d6f598466784716eec9f791c2b52642dfac7cc2cddc6356182204a7f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed8a298d6f598466784716eec9f791c2b52642dfac7cc2cddc6356182204a7f33</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9919-0486 ; 0000000329907362 ; 0000000174484632</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032033/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902,38845,38867,53815,53842</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://ifp.hal.science/hal-03007787$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1670151$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueydon, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachynski, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonkman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amet, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardsell, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boudet, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Féron, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbush, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galinos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnois, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haudin, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreff, J Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leimeister, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemmer, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mckinnon, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendikoa, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghtadaei, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netzband, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegalajar-Jurado, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, M Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruehl, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schünemann, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surmont, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trubat, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qwist, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Phase I of the OC6 project is focused on examining why offshore wind design tools underpredict the response (loads/motion) of the OC5-DeepCwind semisubmersible at its surge and pitch natural frequencies. Previous investigations showed that the underprediction was primarily related to nonlinear hydrodynamic loading, so two new validation campaigns were performed to separately examine the different hydrodynamic load components. In this paper, we validate a variety of tools against this new test data, focusing on the ability to accurately model the low-frequency loads on a semisubmersible floater when held fixed under wave excitation and when forced to oscillate in the surge direction. However, it is observed that models providing better load predictions in these two scenarios do not necessarily produce a more accurate motion response in a moored configuration.</description><subject>Environmental Engineering</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>hydrodynamic loads</subject><subject>offshore wind</subject><subject>WIND ENERGY</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>O3W</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkd1LHDEUxYeiUD_6NzT0zcJ08zGTZPomS1u3LCiozyEmN05kTabJrLL0n2_GkQWhDz7lkvM7F-45VfWZ4G8ES7kgoqE1bzu-IJzIBVtgRjFjH6qjvXKwn6X8WB3n_IALwZg4qv5eLjm66nUGtPqOVuEJ8ujv9ejDPRp7QNtgIQ0JrDejjwFFhzbxuXYJ_mwhmB3qdzZFuwv60ZsiaZuRDhYlyEMMGfLk0MgV5WXnsy_iuE13PsBpdej0JsOn1_ekuv3542Z5Ua8vf62W5-vaNA0fa7BS005a7tpONpwL2QjCAUznREcMvWspb6h12ghjqLHWcNaWKCjFjRaOsZPqy7w3lttUNn4E05sYAphRES4waUmBzmao1xs1JP-o005F7dXF-VpNf5hhLIQUTxMrZtakmHMCtzcQrKZS1BS3mqJXUymKqbmU4mSz08dBPcRtCuXwd7i-_sf1-2p5_RZUg3XsH6fonKA</recordid><startdate>20200922</startdate><enddate>20200922</enddate><creator>Robertson, A N</creator><creator>Gueydon, S</creator><creator>Bachynski, E</creator><creator>Wang, L</creator><creator>Jonkman, J</creator><creator>Alarcón, D</creator><creator>Amet, E</creator><creator>Beardsell, A</creator><creator>Bonnet, P</creator><creator>Boudet, B</creator><creator>Brun, C</creator><creator>Chen, Z</creator><creator>Féron, M</creator><creator>Forbush, D</creator><creator>Galinos, C</creator><creator>Galvan, J</creator><creator>Gilbert, P</creator><creator>Gómez, J</creator><creator>Harnois, V</creator><creator>Haudin, F</creator><creator>Hu, Z</creator><creator>Dreff, J Le</creator><creator>Leimeister, M</creator><creator>Lemmer, F</creator><creator>Li, H</creator><creator>Mckinnon, G</creator><creator>Mendikoa, I</creator><creator>Moghtadaei, A</creator><creator>Netzband, S</creator><creator>Oh, S</creator><creator>Pegalajar-Jurado, A</creator><creator>Nguyen, M Q</creator><creator>Ruehl, K</creator><creator>Schünemann, P</creator><creator>Shi, W</creator><creator>Shin, H</creator><creator>Si, Y</creator><creator>Surmont, F</creator><creator>Trubat, P</creator><creator>Qwist, J</creator><creator>Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>IOP Science</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9919-0486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000329907362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000174484632</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200922</creationdate><title>OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine</title><author>Robertson, A N ; Gueydon, S ; Bachynski, E ; Wang, L ; Jonkman, J ; Alarcón, D ; Amet, E ; Beardsell, A ; Bonnet, P ; Boudet, B ; Brun, C ; Chen, Z ; Féron, M ; Forbush, D ; Galinos, C ; Galvan, J ; Gilbert, P ; Gómez, J ; Harnois, V ; Haudin, F ; Hu, Z ; Dreff, J Le ; Leimeister, M ; Lemmer, F ; Li, H ; Mckinnon, G ; Mendikoa, I ; Moghtadaei, A ; Netzband, S ; Oh, S ; Pegalajar-Jurado, A ; Nguyen, M Q ; Ruehl, K ; Schünemann, P ; Shi, W ; Shin, H ; Si, Y ; Surmont, F ; Trubat, P ; Qwist, J ; Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c446t-ed8a298d6f598466784716eec9f791c2b52642dfac7cc2cddc6356182204a7f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Environmental Engineering</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>hydrodynamic loads</topic><topic>offshore wind</topic><topic>WIND ENERGY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robertson, A N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gueydon, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bachynski, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonkman, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alarcón, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amet, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beardsell, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bonnet, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boudet, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brun, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Féron, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forbush, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galinos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galvan, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilbert, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gómez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harnois, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haudin, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Z</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreff, J Le</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leimeister, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lemmer, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mckinnon, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendikoa, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moghtadaei, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Netzband, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oh, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pegalajar-Jurado, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nguyen, M Q</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruehl, K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schünemann, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shi, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shin, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Si, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Surmont, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Trubat, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qwist, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robertson, A N</au><au>Gueydon, S</au><au>Bachynski, E</au><au>Wang, L</au><au>Jonkman, J</au><au>Alarcón, D</au><au>Amet, E</au><au>Beardsell, A</au><au>Bonnet, P</au><au>Boudet, B</au><au>Brun, C</au><au>Chen, Z</au><au>Féron, M</au><au>Forbush, D</au><au>Galinos, C</au><au>Galvan, J</au><au>Gilbert, P</au><au>Gómez, J</au><au>Harnois, V</au><au>Haudin, F</au><au>Hu, Z</au><au>Dreff, J Le</au><au>Leimeister, M</au><au>Lemmer, F</au><au>Li, H</au><au>Mckinnon, G</au><au>Mendikoa, I</au><au>Moghtadaei, A</au><au>Netzband, S</au><au>Oh, S</au><au>Pegalajar-Jurado, A</au><au>Nguyen, M Q</au><au>Ruehl, K</au><au>Schünemann, P</au><au>Shi, W</au><au>Shin, H</au><au>Si, Y</au><au>Surmont, F</au><au>Trubat, P</au><au>Qwist, J</au><au>Wohlfahrt-Laymann, S</au><aucorp>National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2020-09-22</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>1618</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>32033</spage><pages>32033-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Phase I of the OC6 project is focused on examining why offshore wind design tools underpredict the response (loads/motion) of the OC5-DeepCwind semisubmersible at its surge and pitch natural frequencies. Previous investigations showed that the underprediction was primarily related to nonlinear hydrodynamic loading, so two new validation campaigns were performed to separately examine the different hydrodynamic load components. In this paper, we validate a variety of tools against this new test data, focusing on the ability to accurately model the low-frequency loads on a semisubmersible floater when held fixed under wave excitation and when forced to oscillate in the surge direction. However, it is observed that models providing better load predictions in these two scenarios do not necessarily produce a more accurate motion response in a moored configuration.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032033</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9919-0486</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000329907362</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000174484632</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1742-6588 |
ispartof | Journal of physics. Conference series, 2020-09, Vol.1618 (3), p.32033 |
issn | 1742-6588 1742-6596 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_03007787v1 |
source | IOP Publishing Free Content; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; IOPscience extra; Alma/SFX Local Collection; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Environmental Engineering Environmental Sciences hydrodynamic loads offshore wind WIND ENERGY |
title | OC6 Phase I: Investigating the underprediction of low-frequency hydrodynamic loads and responses of a floating wind turbine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T05%3A50%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=OC6%20Phase%20I:%20Investigating%20the%20underprediction%20of%20low-frequency%20hydrodynamic%20loads%20and%20responses%20of%20a%20floating%20wind%20turbine&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Robertson,%20A%20N&rft.aucorp=National%20Renewable%20Energy%20Laboratory%20(NREL),%20Golden,%20CO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2020-09-22&rft.volume=1618&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=32033&rft.pages=32033-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/1618/3/032033&rft_dat=%3Chal_osti_%3Eoai_HAL_hal_03007787v1%3C/hal_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |