Reducing Attentional Bias in Individuals With Alcohol Use Disorders With a Tablet Application: A Randomized Controlled Trial Pilot Study

Abstract Aims Cognitive bias modification (CBM) training has been considered a promising and effective intervention tool for reducing cognitive biases toward alcohol. However, the link between the cognitive process and actual behavior remains statistically insignificant because computerized tasks do...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Alcohol and alcoholism (Oxford) 2020-02, Vol.55 (1), p.51-55
Hauptverfasser: Flaudias, Valentin, Zerhouni, Oulmann, Chakroun-Baggioni, Nadia, Pires, Sylvie, Schmitt, Audrey, De Chazeron, Ingrid, Llorca, Pierre Michel, Brousse, Georges
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Aims Cognitive bias modification (CBM) training has been considered a promising and effective intervention tool for reducing cognitive biases toward alcohol. However, the link between the cognitive process and actual behavior remains statistically insignificant because computerized tasks do not have sufficient ecological validity and suffer from high dropout rates. The recent development of ‘serious games’ has shown encouraging results in maintaining adherence to health-related interventions. We aim to evaluate a CBM program using a gamified attentional bias (AB) training procedure on a touchpad for individuals with alcohol use disorders. Methods Forty-one patients were included in this study, 33 of whom displayed an AB and were randomly assigned into the ‘CBM group’ (N = 18, 16.7% women) or ‘Memory group’—which involved playing a memory game—(N = 15, no woman). Eight other participants (12.5% women) with no AB comprised the ‘Without AB group’. Efficacy was assessed for AB, craving, and inhibition and attentional capacities before and after the program. Results We observed that the reduction of AB was higher for the ‘CBM group’ (Mbefore = 153.61, SD = 172.21; Mafter = 18.00, SD = 77.71; t (17) = 4.21, P = 0.001) than for the ‘Memory group’ (Mbefore = 73.20, SD = 66.65; Mafter =42.47, SD = 113.77; ts 
ISSN:0735-0414
1464-3502
DOI:10.1093/alcalc/agz080