Individual differences in cell-mediated and humoral immunity in pigs
Previous experiments displayed consistent individual behavioural differences in pigs. Some showed a more active behavioural response (aggressive and resistant; so-called A R pigs), others a more passive behavioural response (non-aggressive and non-resistant; so-called NA NR pigs). Moreover, these be...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 1995-03, Vol.45 (1), p.97-113 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Previous experiments displayed consistent individual behavioural differences in pigs. Some showed a more active behavioural response (aggressive and resistant; so-called
A
R
pigs), others a more passive behavioural response (non-aggressive and non-resistant; so-called
NA
NR
pigs). Moreover, these behavioural coping strategies were associated with different behavioural, physiological and endocrine responses under stress conditions. In the present study we selected 32
A
R
and 32
NA
NR
individuals and tested their immune reactivity in reaction to stress using several cell-mediated (CMI) and humoral immunological tests. Active
A
R
pigs had a higher in vivo and in vitro CMI to nonspecific and specific antigens, while after stress CMI reduced more in
A
R
than in
NA
NR
pigs. In contrast, humoral immunity was highest in
NA
NR
pigs. Furthermore, some serologically typed swine lymphocyte antigen (SLA) class I haplotypes were not equally distributed between
A
R
and
NA
NR
pigs. In general, these findings show that measurement of immune reactivity is an important tool to define how animals cope with environmental demands. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0165-2427 1873-2534 |
DOI: | 10.1016/0165-2427(94)05338-S |