Individual differences in cell-mediated and humoral immunity in pigs

Previous experiments displayed consistent individual behavioural differences in pigs. Some showed a more active behavioural response (aggressive and resistant; so-called A R pigs), others a more passive behavioural response (non-aggressive and non-resistant; so-called NA NR pigs). Moreover, these be...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Veterinary immunology and immunopathology 1995-03, Vol.45 (1), p.97-113
Hauptverfasser: Hessing, M.J.C., Coenen, G.J., Vaiman, M., Renard, C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Previous experiments displayed consistent individual behavioural differences in pigs. Some showed a more active behavioural response (aggressive and resistant; so-called A R pigs), others a more passive behavioural response (non-aggressive and non-resistant; so-called NA NR pigs). Moreover, these behavioural coping strategies were associated with different behavioural, physiological and endocrine responses under stress conditions. In the present study we selected 32 A R and 32 NA NR individuals and tested their immune reactivity in reaction to stress using several cell-mediated (CMI) and humoral immunological tests. Active A R pigs had a higher in vivo and in vitro CMI to nonspecific and specific antigens, while after stress CMI reduced more in A R than in NA NR pigs. In contrast, humoral immunity was highest in NA NR pigs. Furthermore, some serologically typed swine lymphocyte antigen (SLA) class I haplotypes were not equally distributed between A R and NA NR pigs. In general, these findings show that measurement of immune reactivity is an important tool to define how animals cope with environmental demands.
ISSN:0165-2427
1873-2534
DOI:10.1016/0165-2427(94)05338-S