Estrus synchronization in beef cows: comparison between GnRH+PGF2alpha+GnRH and PRID+PGF2alpha+eCG

The aim of this study was to compare two protocols for estrus synchronization in suckled beef cows over a 2 years period. The population studied consisted of 172 Charolais and 168 Limousin cows from 12 and 14 beef herds, respectively. In each herd, cows were allotted to groups according to parity, b...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Theriogenology 2003-07, Vol.60 (2), p.319-330
Hauptverfasser: Mialot, J P, Constant, F, Dezaux, P, Grimard, B, Deletang, F, Ponter, A A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to compare two protocols for estrus synchronization in suckled beef cows over a 2 years period. The population studied consisted of 172 Charolais and 168 Limousin cows from 12 and 14 beef herds, respectively. In each herd, cows were allotted to groups according to parity, body condition score and calving difficulty. Cows in Group 1 (n=174) received PRID on Day-8 with estradiol benzoate (10mg, vaginal capsule), dinoprost on Day-4 (25mg i.m.), eCG on Day 2 (500 IU i.m.). The PRID was removed on Day-2 and cows were inseminated on Day 0, 56 h after PRID was removed. Cows in Group 2 (n=166) received GnRH on Day-10 (100 microg i.m.), dinoprost on Day-3 (25mg i.m.) and GnRH on Day-1 (100 microg i.m.), and were inseminated on Day 0, 16-24h after the last GnRH treatment. Plasma progesterone concentrations were measured to determine cyclicity prior to treatment (Days-20 and -10), to confirm the occurrence of ovulation (Days 0 and 10) and to determine the apparent early pregnancy rate (Days 0, 10 and 24). Pregnancy diagnosis was performed by ultrasonography between Days 35 and 45. The effects of various factors on ovulation, apparent early pregnancy and pregnancy rates were studied using logistic mixed models. There was no significant difference between Groups 1 and 2, respectively, for the cyclicity rate before treatment (80.5% versus 80.1%), for apparent pregnancy rate on Day 24 (62.1% versus 54.8%, P=0.09) and for pregnancy rate on Days 35-45 (53.8% versus 46.3%, P=0.16). Ovulation rate was higher (P
ISSN:0093-691X