Ear density estimation from high resolution RGB imagery using deep learning technique

•The density of wheat ears was estimated from high resolution RGB imagery.•The Faster-RCNN object detection model was more robust than TasselNet counting by regression model.•The optimal spatial resolution for Faster-RCNN was around 0.3 mm.•Faster-RCNN estimates showed high heritability around 85% a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Agricultural and forest meteorology 2019-01, Vol.264, p.225-234
Hauptverfasser: Madec, Simon, Jin, Xiuliang, Lu, Hao, De Solan, Benoit, Liu, Shouyang, Duyme, Florent, Heritier, Emmanuelle, Baret, Frédéric
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•The density of wheat ears was estimated from high resolution RGB imagery.•The Faster-RCNN object detection model was more robust than TasselNet counting by regression model.•The optimal spatial resolution for Faster-RCNN was around 0.3 mm.•Faster-RCNN estimates showed high heritability around 85% and relatively good agreement with in-situ ear density (rRMSE≈15%). Wheat ear density estimation is an appealing trait for plant breeders. Current manual counting is tedious and inefficient. In this study we investigated the potential of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to provide accurate ear density using nadir high spatial resolution RGB images. Two different approaches were investigated, either using the Faster-RCNN state-of-the-art object detector or with the TasselNet local count regression network. Both approaches performed very well (rRMSE≈6%) when applied over the same conditions as those prevailing for the calibration of the models. However, Faster-RCNN was more robust when applied to a dataset acquired at a later stage with ears and background showing a different aspect because of the higher maturity of the plants. Optimal spatial resolution for Faster-RCNN was around 0.3 mm allowing to acquire RGB images from a UAV platform for high-throughput phenotyping of large experiments. Comparison of the estimated ear density with in-situ manual counting shows reasonable agreement considering the relatively small sampling area used for both methods. Faster-RCNN and in-situ counting had high and similar heritability (H²≈85%), demonstrating that ear density derived from high resolution RGB imagery could replace the traditional counting method.
ISSN:0168-1923
1873-2240
DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.10.013