Children’s socio-emotional skills: Is there a quantity–quality trade-off?

•We estimate the effect of family size on children’s socio-emotional skills in the UK.•We instrument family size by the sex of two first-born.•We find negative effects, which persist over time.•These negative effects are entirely driven by girls.•Compensating parental behaviors in favor of boys may...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Labour economics 2020-06, Vol.64, p.101811, Article 101811
Hauptverfasser: Briole, Simon, Le Forner, Hélène, Lepinteur, Anthony
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•We estimate the effect of family size on children’s socio-emotional skills in the UK.•We instrument family size by the sex of two first-born.•We find negative effects, which persist over time.•These negative effects are entirely driven by girls.•Compensating parental behaviors in favor of boys may explain this heterogeneity. Although it is widely acknowledged that non-cognitive skills matter for adult outcomes, little is known about the role played by family environment in the formation of these skills. We use a longitudinal survey of children born in the UK in 2000–2001, the Millennium Cohort Study by the Centre for Longitudinal Studies, to estimate the effect of family size on socio-emotional skills, measured by the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. To account for the endogeneity of fertility decisions, we use a well-known instrumental approach that exploits parents’ preference for children’s gender diversity. We show that the birth of a third child negatively affects the socio-emotional skills of the first two children in a persistent manner. However, we show that this negative effect is entirely driven by girls. We provide evidence that this gender effect is partly driven by an unequal response of parents’ time investment in favour of boys and, to a lesser extent, by an unequal demand for household chores.
ISSN:0927-5371
1879-1034
DOI:10.1016/j.labeco.2020.101811