The $$\pi \eta $$ interaction and $$a_0$$ resonances in photon–photon scattering
We revisit the information on the two lightest $$a_0$$ a 0 resonances and S -wave $$\pi \eta $$ π η scattering that can be extracted from photon–photon scattering experiments. For this purpose we construct a model for the S -wave photon–photon amplitudes which satisfies analyticity properties, two-c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields Particles and fields, 2020-05, Vol.80 (5), Article 436 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | We revisit the information on the two lightest
$$a_0$$
a
0
resonances and
S
-wave
$$\pi \eta $$
π
η
scattering that can be extracted from photon–photon scattering experiments. For this purpose we construct a model for the
S
-wave photon–photon amplitudes which satisfies analyticity properties, two-channel unitarity and obeys the soft photon as well as the soft pion constraints. The underlying I=1 hadronic
T
-matrix involves six phenomenological parameters and is able to account for two resonances below 1.5 GeV. We perform a combined fit of the
$$\gamma \gamma \rightarrow \pi \eta $$
γ
γ
→
π
η
and
$$\gamma \gamma \rightarrow K_SK_S$$
γ
γ
→
K
S
K
S
high statistics experimental data from the Belle collaboration. Minimisation of the
$$\chi ^2$$
χ
2
is found to have two distinct solutions with approximately equal
$$\chi ^2$$
χ
2
. One of these exhibits a light and narrow excited
$$a_0$$
a
0
resonance analogous to the one found in the Belle analysis. This however requires a peculiar coincidence between the
$$J=0$$
J
=
0
and
$$J=2$$
J
=
2
resonance effects which is likely to be unphysical. In both solutions the
$$a_0(980)$$
a
0
(
980
)
resonance appears as a pole on the second Riemann sheet. The location of this pole in the physical solution is determined to be
$$m-i\varGamma /2=1000.7^{+12.9}_{-0.7} -i\,36.6^{+12.7}_{-2.6}$$
m
-
i
Γ
/
2
=
1000
.
7
-
0.7
+
12.9
-
i
36
.
6
-
2.6
+
12.7
MeV. The solutions are also compared to experimental data in the kinematical region of the decay
$$\eta \rightarrow \pi ^0\gamma \gamma $$
η
→
π
0
γ
γ
. In this region an isospin violating contribution associated with
$${\pi ^+}{\pi ^-}$$
π
+
π
-
rescattering must be added for which we provide a dispersive evaluation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1434-6044 1434-6052 |
DOI: | 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7969-8 |