In-plane permeability characterization of engineering textiles based on radial flow experiments: A benchmark exercise

Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Composites. Part A, Applied science and manufacturing Applied science and manufacturing, 2019-06, Vol.121, p.100-114
Hauptverfasser: May, D., Aktas, A., Advani, S.G., Berg, D.C., Endruweit, A., Fauster, E., Lomov, S.V., Long, A., Mitschang, P., Abaimov, S., Abliz, D., Akhatov, I., Ali, M.A., Allen, T.D., Bickerton, S., Bodaghi, M., Caglar, B., Caglar, H., Chiminelli, A., Correia, N., Cosson, B., Danzi, M., Dittmann, J., Ermanni, P., Francucci, G., George, A., Grishaev, V., Hancioglu, M., Kabachi, M.A., Kind, K., Deléglise-Lagardère, M., Laspalas, M., Lebedev, O.V., Lizaranzu, M., Liotier, P.-J., Middendorf, P., Morán, J., Park, C.-H., Pipes, R.B., Pucci, M.F., Raynal, J., Rodriguez, E.S., Schledjewski, R., Schubnel, R., Sharp, N., Sims, G., Sozer, E.M., Sousa, P., Thomas, J., Umer, R., Wijaya, W., Willenbacher, B., Yong, A., Zaremba, S., Ziegmann, G.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Although good progress was made by two international benchmark exercises on in-plane permeability, existing methods have not yet been standardized. This paper presents the results of a third benchmark exercise using in-plane permeability measurement, based on systems applying the radial unsaturated injection method. 19 participants using 20 systems characterized a non-crimp and a woven fabric at three different fiber volume contents, using a commercially available silicone oil as impregnating fluid. They followed a detailed characterization procedure and also completed a questionnaire on their set-up and analysis methods. Excluding outliers (2 of 20), the average coefficient of variation (cv) between the participant’s results was 32% and 44% (non-crimp and woven fabric), while the average cv for individual participants was 8% and 12%, respectively. This indicates statistically significant variations between the measurement systems. Cavity deformation was identified as a major influence, besides fluid pressure/viscosity measurement, textile variations, and data analysis.
ISSN:1359-835X
1878-5840
DOI:10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.006