Comparing Two Clusterings Using Matchings between Clusters of Clusters
Clustering is a fundamental problem in data science, yet the variety of clustering methods and their sensitivity to parameters make clustering hard. To analyze the stability of a given clustering algorithm while varying its parameters, and to compare clusters yielded by different algorithms, several...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The ACM journal of experimental algorithmics 2019-12, Vol.24 (1), p.1-41 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Clustering is a fundamental problem in data science, yet the variety of clustering methods and their sensitivity to parameters make clustering hard. To analyze the stability of a given clustering algorithm while varying its parameters, and to compare clusters yielded by different algorithms, several comparison schemes based on matchings, information theory, and various indices (Rand, Jaccard) have been developed. We go beyond these by providing a novel class of methods computing meta-clusters within each clustering—a
meta-cluster
is a group of clusters, together with a matching between these.
Let the intersection graph of two clusterings be the edge-weighted bipartite graph in which the nodes represent the clusters, the edges represent the nonempty intersection between two clusters, and the weight of an edge is the number of common items. We introduce the so-called
D
-family-matching problem on intersection graphs, with
D
the upper bound on the diameter of the graph induced by the clusters of any meta-cluster. First we prove
NP
-completeness and
APX
-hardness results, and unbounded approximation ratio of simple strategies. Second, we design exact polynomial time dynamic programming algorithms for some classes of graphs (in particular trees). Then we prove spanning tree–based efficient heuristic algorithms for general graphs.
Our experiments illustrate the role of
D
as a scale parameter providing information on the relationship between clusters within a clustering and in-between two clusterings. They also show the advantages of our built-in mapping over classical cluster comparison measures such as the variation of information. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1084-6654 1084-6654 |
DOI: | 10.1145/3345951 |