Cortical voluntary activation testing methodology impacts central fatigue
Purpose Currently, cortical voluntary activation (VA TMS ) is assessed by superimposing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 75% MVC and 50% MVC, each contraction being interspersed with 5–10 s of relaxation. Here, we assessed whether this traditional app...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of applied physiology 2017-09, Vol.117 (9), p.1845-1857 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Purpose
Currently, cortical voluntary activation (VA
TMS
) is assessed by superimposing transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) on a maximal voluntary contraction (MVC), 75% MVC and 50% MVC, each contraction being interspersed with 5–10 s of relaxation. Here, we assessed whether this traditional approach (TRADI) underestimates central fatigue due to this short recovery compared to a continuous method (CONTI).
Methods
VA
TMS
, motor-evoked potential (MEP), and cortical silent period (CSP) of the
vastus lateralis
were determined in 12 young healthy adults before and after a 2-min sustained MVC of knee extensors in two randomly assigned sessions. In TRADI, evaluations comprised a 7-s rest between the three contractions (100, 75, and 50% MVC) and evaluation following the 2-min sustained MVC started after a minimal rest (3–4 s). In CONTI, evaluations were performed with no rest allowed between the three levels of contraction, and evaluation after the 2-min sustained MVC commenced without any rest.
Results
MVC was equally depressed at the end of the 2 min in both conditions. Post 2-min sustained MVC, VA
TMS
change was greater in CONTI than in TRADI (−29 (15)% [−42, −17] vs. −9 (4)% [−13, −5], respectively,
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 1439-6319 1439-6327 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00421-017-3678-x |