Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling
Background Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling. Purpose To...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2019-09, Vol.50 (3), p.982-993 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 993 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 982 |
container_title | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging |
container_volume | 50 |
creator | Bouaou, Kevin Bargiotas, Ioannis Dietenbeck, Thomas Bollache, Emilie Soulat, Gilles Craiem, Damian Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia De Cesare, Alain Gencer, Umit Giron, Alain Redheuil, Alban Messas, Emmanuel Lucor, Didier Mousseaux, Elie Kachenoura, Nadjia |
description | Background
Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling.
Purpose
To compute aortic time‐resolved pressure fields of healthy subjects from 4D flow MRI and to define relevant pressure‐based markers while investigating their relationship with age, LV remodeling, as well as tonometric augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Forty‐seven healthy subjects (age: 49.5 ± 18 years, 24 women).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T/4D flow MRI.
Assessment
Spatiotemporal pressure fields were computed by integrating velocity‐derived pressure gradients using Navier–Stokes equations, while assuming zero pressure at the sino‐tubular junction. To quantify aortic pressure spatiotemporal variations, we defined the following markers: 1) volumetric aortic pressure propagation rates ΔP
E1/ΔV and ΔP
E2/ΔV, representing variations of early and late systolic relative pressure peaks along the aorta, respectively, according to the cumulated aortic volume; 2) ΔA
PE1‐PE2 defined in four aortic regions as the absolute difference between early and late systolic relative pressure peaks amplitude.
Statistical Tests
Linear regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Bland–Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results
Spatiotemporal variations of aortic pressure peaks were moderately to highly reproducible (ICC ≥0.50) and decreased significantly with age, in terms of absolute magnitude: ΔP
E1/ΔV (r = 0.70, P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/jmri.26673 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02384661v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2179480133</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3913-fd8c7fd9434f707b9104ed9e9fedd3c82418059e93b87a19dc5c032086f620c63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90U1v0zAYB_AIMbExuPABkCUugJTht9gJt2rANlSEhOBsufbj1ZUTFztp1RsfHXcZO-zAyS_66S8__lfVK4IvCMb0w6ZP_oIKIdmT6ow0lNa0acXTsscNq0mL5Wn1POcNxrjrePOsOmVYEl7QWfVnMehwyD6j6JCOafQGbRPkPCVAzkOwGbkUe8Q_IRfiHn37cYP8gNagw7g-oF0M0zACpPwRLXKOxuvRxyGjvR_XSN8C0oNFAdyIdjCMyZsp6IQS9NFC8MPti-rE6ZDh5f16Xv368vnn5XW9_H51c7lY1oZ1hNXOtkY623HGncRy1RHMwXbQObCWmZbyMmdTzmzVSk06axqDGcWtcIJiI9h59W7OXeugtsn3Oh1U1F5dL5bqeIcpa7kQZEeKfTvbbYq_J8ij6n02EIIeIE5ZUSI73mLCWKFvHtFNnFL506KoLJC1ghb1flYmxZwTuIcXEKyOHapjh-quw4Jf30dOqx7sA_1XWgFkBnsf4PCfKPW1tDWH_gXgfqZ6</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2272173862</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling</title><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><creator>Bouaou, Kevin ; Bargiotas, Ioannis ; Dietenbeck, Thomas ; Bollache, Emilie ; Soulat, Gilles ; Craiem, Damian ; Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia ; De Cesare, Alain ; Gencer, Umit ; Giron, Alain ; Redheuil, Alban ; Messas, Emmanuel ; Lucor, Didier ; Mousseaux, Elie ; Kachenoura, Nadjia</creator><creatorcontrib>Bouaou, Kevin ; Bargiotas, Ioannis ; Dietenbeck, Thomas ; Bollache, Emilie ; Soulat, Gilles ; Craiem, Damian ; Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia ; De Cesare, Alain ; Gencer, Umit ; Giron, Alain ; Redheuil, Alban ; Messas, Emmanuel ; Lucor, Didier ; Mousseaux, Elie ; Kachenoura, Nadjia</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling.
Purpose
To compute aortic time‐resolved pressure fields of healthy subjects from 4D flow MRI and to define relevant pressure‐based markers while investigating their relationship with age, LV remodeling, as well as tonometric augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Forty‐seven healthy subjects (age: 49.5 ± 18 years, 24 women).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T/4D flow MRI.
Assessment
Spatiotemporal pressure fields were computed by integrating velocity‐derived pressure gradients using Navier–Stokes equations, while assuming zero pressure at the sino‐tubular junction. To quantify aortic pressure spatiotemporal variations, we defined the following markers: 1) volumetric aortic pressure propagation rates ΔP
E1/ΔV and ΔP
E2/ΔV, representing variations of early and late systolic relative pressure peaks along the aorta, respectively, according to the cumulated aortic volume; 2) ΔA
PE1‐PE2 defined in four aortic regions as the absolute difference between early and late systolic relative pressure peaks amplitude.
Statistical Tests
Linear regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Bland–Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results
Spatiotemporal variations of aortic pressure peaks were moderately to highly reproducible (ICC ≥0.50) and decreased significantly with age, in terms of absolute magnitude: ΔP
E1/ΔV (r = 0.70, P < 0.005), ΔP
E2/ΔV (r = –0.45, P < 0.005) and ΔA
PE1‐PE2 (|r| > 0.39, P < 0.005). ΔP
E1/ΔV was associated with LV remodeling (r = 0.53, P < 0.001) and ascending aorta ΔA
PE1‐PE2 was associated with AIx (r = –0.59, P < 0.001). Both associations were independent of age and systolic blood pressures. Only weak associations were found between pressure indices and PWV (r ≤ 0.40).
Data Conclusion
4D flow MRI relative aortic pressures were consistent with physiological knowledge as demonstrated by their significant volumetric and temporal variations with age and their independent association with LV remodeling and augmentation index.
Level of Evidence 2
Technical Efficacy Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:982–993.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-1807</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1522-2586</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/jmri.26673</identifier><identifier>PMID: 30714258</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc</publisher><subject>4D flow ; Age ; Aging ; Aorta ; aortic pressure waveform ; Augmentation ; Blood pressure ; Computational fluid dynamics ; Coronary vessels ; Correlation analysis ; Correlation coefficients ; Elastic waves ; Field strength ; Fluid mechanics ; Heart ; LV remodeling ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Markers ; Mechanics ; MRI ; Physics ; Population (statistical) ; Population studies ; Pressure gradients ; Regression analysis ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Stiffness ; Temporal variations ; Velocity ; Ventricle ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-09, Vol.50 (3), p.982-993</ispartof><rights>2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine</rights><rights>2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3913-fd8c7fd9434f707b9104ed9e9fedd3c82418059e93b87a19dc5c032086f620c63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3913-fd8c7fd9434f707b9104ed9e9fedd3c82418059e93b87a19dc5c032086f620c63</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5643-0497 ; 0000-0002-1069-1293 ; 0000-0002-0480-4028 ; 0000-0003-4334-4586 ; 0000-0002-8076-1445 ; 0000-0002-9893-9694 ; 0000-0002-1002-9902</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fjmri.26673$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fjmri.26673$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30714258$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-02384661$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bouaou, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargiotas, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietenbeck, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollache, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soulat, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craiem, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cesare, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencer, Umit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giron, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redheuil, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messas, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucor, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousseaux, Elie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachenoura, Nadjia</creatorcontrib><title>Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling</title><title>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</title><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><description>Background
Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling.
Purpose
To compute aortic time‐resolved pressure fields of healthy subjects from 4D flow MRI and to define relevant pressure‐based markers while investigating their relationship with age, LV remodeling, as well as tonometric augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Forty‐seven healthy subjects (age: 49.5 ± 18 years, 24 women).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T/4D flow MRI.
Assessment
Spatiotemporal pressure fields were computed by integrating velocity‐derived pressure gradients using Navier–Stokes equations, while assuming zero pressure at the sino‐tubular junction. To quantify aortic pressure spatiotemporal variations, we defined the following markers: 1) volumetric aortic pressure propagation rates ΔP
E1/ΔV and ΔP
E2/ΔV, representing variations of early and late systolic relative pressure peaks along the aorta, respectively, according to the cumulated aortic volume; 2) ΔA
PE1‐PE2 defined in four aortic regions as the absolute difference between early and late systolic relative pressure peaks amplitude.
Statistical Tests
Linear regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Bland–Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results
Spatiotemporal variations of aortic pressure peaks were moderately to highly reproducible (ICC ≥0.50) and decreased significantly with age, in terms of absolute magnitude: ΔP
E1/ΔV (r = 0.70, P < 0.005), ΔP
E2/ΔV (r = –0.45, P < 0.005) and ΔA
PE1‐PE2 (|r| > 0.39, P < 0.005). ΔP
E1/ΔV was associated with LV remodeling (r = 0.53, P < 0.001) and ascending aorta ΔA
PE1‐PE2 was associated with AIx (r = –0.59, P < 0.001). Both associations were independent of age and systolic blood pressures. Only weak associations were found between pressure indices and PWV (r ≤ 0.40).
Data Conclusion
4D flow MRI relative aortic pressures were consistent with physiological knowledge as demonstrated by their significant volumetric and temporal variations with age and their independent association with LV remodeling and augmentation index.
Level of Evidence 2
Technical Efficacy Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:982–993.</description><subject>4D flow</subject><subject>Age</subject><subject>Aging</subject><subject>Aorta</subject><subject>aortic pressure waveform</subject><subject>Augmentation</subject><subject>Blood pressure</subject><subject>Computational fluid dynamics</subject><subject>Coronary vessels</subject><subject>Correlation analysis</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Elastic waves</subject><subject>Field strength</subject><subject>Fluid mechanics</subject><subject>Heart</subject><subject>LV remodeling</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Markers</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>MRI</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Population (statistical)</subject><subject>Population studies</subject><subject>Pressure gradients</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Temporal variations</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Ventricle</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>1053-1807</issn><issn>1522-2586</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp90U1v0zAYB_AIMbExuPABkCUugJTht9gJt2rANlSEhOBsufbj1ZUTFztp1RsfHXcZO-zAyS_66S8__lfVK4IvCMb0w6ZP_oIKIdmT6ow0lNa0acXTsscNq0mL5Wn1POcNxrjrePOsOmVYEl7QWfVnMehwyD6j6JCOafQGbRPkPCVAzkOwGbkUe8Q_IRfiHn37cYP8gNagw7g-oF0M0zACpPwRLXKOxuvRxyGjvR_XSN8C0oNFAdyIdjCMyZsp6IQS9NFC8MPti-rE6ZDh5f16Xv368vnn5XW9_H51c7lY1oZ1hNXOtkY623HGncRy1RHMwXbQObCWmZbyMmdTzmzVSk06axqDGcWtcIJiI9h59W7OXeugtsn3Oh1U1F5dL5bqeIcpa7kQZEeKfTvbbYq_J8ij6n02EIIeIE5ZUSI73mLCWKFvHtFNnFL506KoLJC1ghb1flYmxZwTuIcXEKyOHapjh-quw4Jf30dOqx7sA_1XWgFkBnsf4PCfKPW1tDWH_gXgfqZ6</recordid><startdate>201909</startdate><enddate>201909</enddate><creator>Bouaou, Kevin</creator><creator>Bargiotas, Ioannis</creator><creator>Dietenbeck, Thomas</creator><creator>Bollache, Emilie</creator><creator>Soulat, Gilles</creator><creator>Craiem, Damian</creator><creator>Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia</creator><creator>De Cesare, Alain</creator><creator>Gencer, Umit</creator><creator>Giron, Alain</creator><creator>Redheuil, Alban</creator><creator>Messas, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Lucor, Didier</creator><creator>Mousseaux, Elie</creator><creator>Kachenoura, Nadjia</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5643-0497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-1293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-4028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4334-4586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-1445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-9694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-9902</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201909</creationdate><title>Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling</title><author>Bouaou, Kevin ; Bargiotas, Ioannis ; Dietenbeck, Thomas ; Bollache, Emilie ; Soulat, Gilles ; Craiem, Damian ; Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia ; De Cesare, Alain ; Gencer, Umit ; Giron, Alain ; Redheuil, Alban ; Messas, Emmanuel ; Lucor, Didier ; Mousseaux, Elie ; Kachenoura, Nadjia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3913-fd8c7fd9434f707b9104ed9e9fedd3c82418059e93b87a19dc5c032086f620c63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>4D flow</topic><topic>Age</topic><topic>Aging</topic><topic>Aorta</topic><topic>aortic pressure waveform</topic><topic>Augmentation</topic><topic>Blood pressure</topic><topic>Computational fluid dynamics</topic><topic>Coronary vessels</topic><topic>Correlation analysis</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Elastic waves</topic><topic>Field strength</topic><topic>Fluid mechanics</topic><topic>Heart</topic><topic>LV remodeling</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Markers</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>MRI</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Population (statistical)</topic><topic>Population studies</topic><topic>Pressure gradients</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Temporal variations</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Ventricle</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bouaou, Kevin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bargiotas, Ioannis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dietenbeck, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bollache, Emilie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soulat, Gilles</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Craiem, Damian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Cesare, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gencer, Umit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giron, Alain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Redheuil, Alban</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Messas, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lucor, Didier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mousseaux, Elie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kachenoura, Nadjia</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bouaou, Kevin</au><au>Bargiotas, Ioannis</au><au>Dietenbeck, Thomas</au><au>Bollache, Emilie</au><au>Soulat, Gilles</au><au>Craiem, Damian</au><au>Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia</au><au>De Cesare, Alain</au><au>Gencer, Umit</au><au>Giron, Alain</au><au>Redheuil, Alban</au><au>Messas, Emmanuel</au><au>Lucor, Didier</au><au>Mousseaux, Elie</au><au>Kachenoura, Nadjia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling</atitle><jtitle>Journal of magnetic resonance imaging</jtitle><addtitle>J Magn Reson Imaging</addtitle><date>2019-09</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>982</spage><epage>993</epage><pages>982-993</pages><issn>1053-1807</issn><eissn>1522-2586</eissn><abstract>Background
Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling.
Purpose
To compute aortic time‐resolved pressure fields of healthy subjects from 4D flow MRI and to define relevant pressure‐based markers while investigating their relationship with age, LV remodeling, as well as tonometric augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV).
Study Type
Retrospective.
Population
Forty‐seven healthy subjects (age: 49.5 ± 18 years, 24 women).
Field Strength/Sequence
3 T/4D flow MRI.
Assessment
Spatiotemporal pressure fields were computed by integrating velocity‐derived pressure gradients using Navier–Stokes equations, while assuming zero pressure at the sino‐tubular junction. To quantify aortic pressure spatiotemporal variations, we defined the following markers: 1) volumetric aortic pressure propagation rates ΔP
E1/ΔV and ΔP
E2/ΔV, representing variations of early and late systolic relative pressure peaks along the aorta, respectively, according to the cumulated aortic volume; 2) ΔA
PE1‐PE2 defined in four aortic regions as the absolute difference between early and late systolic relative pressure peaks amplitude.
Statistical Tests
Linear regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Bland–Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC).
Results
Spatiotemporal variations of aortic pressure peaks were moderately to highly reproducible (ICC ≥0.50) and decreased significantly with age, in terms of absolute magnitude: ΔP
E1/ΔV (r = 0.70, P < 0.005), ΔP
E2/ΔV (r = –0.45, P < 0.005) and ΔA
PE1‐PE2 (|r| > 0.39, P < 0.005). ΔP
E1/ΔV was associated with LV remodeling (r = 0.53, P < 0.001) and ascending aorta ΔA
PE1‐PE2 was associated with AIx (r = –0.59, P < 0.001). Both associations were independent of age and systolic blood pressures. Only weak associations were found between pressure indices and PWV (r ≤ 0.40).
Data Conclusion
4D flow MRI relative aortic pressures were consistent with physiological knowledge as demonstrated by their significant volumetric and temporal variations with age and their independent association with LV remodeling and augmentation index.
Level of Evidence 2
Technical Efficacy Stage 3
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;50:982–993.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</pub><pmid>30714258</pmid><doi>10.1002/jmri.26673</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5643-0497</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1069-1293</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0480-4028</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4334-4586</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8076-1445</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9893-9694</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1002-9902</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-1807 |
ispartof | Journal of magnetic resonance imaging, 2019-09, Vol.50 (3), p.982-993 |
issn | 1053-1807 1522-2586 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02384661v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Wiley Online Library Free Content |
subjects | 4D flow Age Aging Aorta aortic pressure waveform Augmentation Blood pressure Computational fluid dynamics Coronary vessels Correlation analysis Correlation coefficients Elastic waves Field strength Fluid mechanics Heart LV remodeling Magnetic resonance imaging Markers Mechanics MRI Physics Population (statistical) Population studies Pressure gradients Regression analysis Statistical analysis Statistical tests Stiffness Temporal variations Velocity Ventricle Wave velocity |
title | Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T08%3A49%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysis%20of%20aortic%20pressure%20fields%20from%204D%20flow%20MRI%20in%20healthy%20volunteers:%20Associations%20with%20age%20and%20left%20ventricular%20remodeling&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20magnetic%20resonance%20imaging&rft.au=Bouaou,%20Kevin&rft.date=2019-09&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=982&rft.epage=993&rft.pages=982-993&rft.issn=1053-1807&rft.eissn=1522-2586&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/jmri.26673&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2179480133%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2272173862&rft_id=info:pmid/30714258&rfr_iscdi=true |