Analysis of aortic pressure fields from 4D flow MRI in healthy volunteers: Associations with age and left ventricular remodeling

Background Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling. Purpose To...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of magnetic resonance imaging 2019-09, Vol.50 (3), p.982-993
Hauptverfasser: Bouaou, Kevin, Bargiotas, Ioannis, Dietenbeck, Thomas, Bollache, Emilie, Soulat, Gilles, Craiem, Damian, Houriez‐Gombaud‐Saintonge, Sophia, De Cesare, Alain, Gencer, Umit, Giron, Alain, Redheuil, Alban, Messas, Emmanuel, Lucor, Didier, Mousseaux, Elie, Kachenoura, Nadjia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Aging‐related arterial stiffness is associated with substantial changes in global and local arterial pressures. The subsequent early return of reflected pressure waves leads to an elevated left ventricular (LV) afterload and ultimately to a deleterious concentric LV remodeling. Purpose To compute aortic time‐resolved pressure fields of healthy subjects from 4D flow MRI and to define relevant pressure‐based markers while investigating their relationship with age, LV remodeling, as well as tonometric augmentation index (AIx) and pulse wave velocity (PWV). Study Type Retrospective. Population Forty‐seven healthy subjects (age: 49.5 ± 18 years, 24 women). Field Strength/Sequence 3 T/4D flow MRI. Assessment Spatiotemporal pressure fields were computed by integrating velocity‐derived pressure gradients using Navier–Stokes equations, while assuming zero pressure at the sino‐tubular junction. To quantify aortic pressure spatiotemporal variations, we defined the following markers: 1) volumetric aortic pressure propagation rates ΔP E1/ΔV and ΔP E2/ΔV, representing variations of early and late systolic relative pressure peaks along the aorta, respectively, according to the cumulated aortic volume; 2) ΔA PE1‐PE2 defined in four aortic regions as the absolute difference between early and late systolic relative pressure peaks amplitude. Statistical Tests Linear regression, Wilcoxon rank sum test, Bland–Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Results Spatiotemporal variations of aortic pressure peaks were moderately to highly reproducible (ICC ≥0.50) and decreased significantly with age, in terms of absolute magnitude: ΔP E1/ΔV (r = 0.70, P 
ISSN:1053-1807
1522-2586
DOI:10.1002/jmri.26673