Lambert’s Theorem: Geometry or Dynamics?
Lambert’s theorem (1761) on the elapsed time along a Keplerian arc drew the attention of several prestigious mathematicians. In particular, they tried to give simple and transparent proofs of it (see our timeline Sect. 9 ). We give two new proofs. The first one (Sect. 4 ) goes along the lines of H...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Celestial mechanics and dynamical astronomy 2019-09, Vol.131 (9), p.1-30, Article 40 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Lambert’s theorem (1761) on the elapsed time along a Keplerian arc drew the attention of several prestigious mathematicians. In particular, they tried to give simple and transparent proofs of it (see our timeline Sect.
9
). We give two new proofs. The first one (Sect.
4
) goes along the lines of Hamilton’s variational proof in his famous paper of 1834, but we shorten his computation in such a way that the hypothesis is now used without redundancy. The second (Sect.
6
) is among the few which are close to Lambert’s geometrical proof. It starts with the new remark that two Keplerian arcs related by the hypothesis of Lambert’s theorem correspond to each other through an affine map. We also show (Sect.
7
) that despite the singularities due to the occurrence of collisions, the classes of arcs related by Lambert’s theorem all have the same topology. We give (Sect.
8
) some simple related results about conic sections and affine transformations. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0923-2958 1572-9478 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10569-019-9916-2 |