Accuracy of the robot‐assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation
Introduction The use of a robot‐assisted technology becomes very competitive. The aim of this work was to define the accuracy of robotic assistance in deep brain stimulation surgery and to compare results with that in the literature. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of lead implantat...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery 2019-12, Vol.15 (6), p.e2032-n/a |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | n/a |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 6 |
| container_start_page | e2032 |
| container_title | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery |
| container_volume | 15 |
| creator | Goia, Alice Gilard, Vianney Lefaucheur, Romain Welter, Marie‐Laure Maltête, David Derrey, Stephane |
| description | Introduction
The use of a robot‐assisted technology becomes very competitive. The aim of this work was to define the accuracy of robotic assistance in deep brain stimulation surgery and to compare results with that in the literature.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of lead implantation in 24 consecutive patients who had robot‐assisted (ROSA, Zimmer‐Biomet) surgery for the treatment of movement disorders. Intended stereotactic coordinates (x, y, z) of contact 0 (the most distal contact at the tip of the electrode) of each definitive lead were compared with actual coordinates obtained by a postoperative CT scan. For each lead, the euclidian 3D distance between the actual and intended location of contact 0 was calculated.
Results
The euclidian 3D distances between the intended and actual location of the contact 0 were 0.81 mm on the right side and 1.12 mm on the left side.
Discussion
Robot‐assisted technology for stereotactic surgery is safe and accurate. The association with a 3D flat‐panel CT scan is an optimized procedure for deep intracranial electrode implantation. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1002/rcs.2032 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02368430v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2319088625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3832-d10f8a382995ea2c5720312366421f5361c9033907b1ff01e987950424e0fdc33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kctKw0AUhgdRbK2CTyABN7pIPXNJMlmWeqlQELyAu2EymdCUJFNnEqU7H8Fn9Emc2lpBcDWH4ePjP-dH6BjDEAOQC6vckAAlO6iPWcLDKI2fd7dzhHvowLk5AItYzPZRj2IG4Pk-uhwp1VmploEpgnamA2sy036-f0jnStfqPFhYo3TeWR2UTZBrvQgyK_3o2rLuKtmWpjlEe4WsnD7avAP0dH31OJ6E07ub2_FoGirKKQlzDAWXlJM0jbQkKkp8ZkxoHDOCi4jGWKVAaQpJhosCsE55kkbACNNQ5IrSATpfe2eyEgtb1tIuhZGlmIymYvUHXsYZhVfs2bM16_O_dNq1oi6d0lUlG206JwhJMKeAY-7R0z_o3HS28ZsIQnEKnMck-hUqa5yzutgmwCBWLQjfgli14NGTjbDLap1vwZ-zeyBcA29lpZf_isT9-OFb-AXxfI2S</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2319088625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accuracy of the robot‐assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><creator>Goia, Alice ; Gilard, Vianney ; Lefaucheur, Romain ; Welter, Marie‐Laure ; Maltête, David ; Derrey, Stephane</creator><creatorcontrib>Goia, Alice ; Gilard, Vianney ; Lefaucheur, Romain ; Welter, Marie‐Laure ; Maltête, David ; Derrey, Stephane</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction
The use of a robot‐assisted technology becomes very competitive. The aim of this work was to define the accuracy of robotic assistance in deep brain stimulation surgery and to compare results with that in the literature.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of lead implantation in 24 consecutive patients who had robot‐assisted (ROSA, Zimmer‐Biomet) surgery for the treatment of movement disorders. Intended stereotactic coordinates (x, y, z) of contact 0 (the most distal contact at the tip of the electrode) of each definitive lead were compared with actual coordinates obtained by a postoperative CT scan. For each lead, the euclidian 3D distance between the actual and intended location of contact 0 was calculated.
Results
The euclidian 3D distances between the intended and actual location of the contact 0 were 0.81 mm on the right side and 1.12 mm on the left side.
Discussion
Robot‐assisted technology for stereotactic surgery is safe and accurate. The association with a 3D flat‐panel CT scan is an optimized procedure for deep intracranial electrode implantation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1478-5951</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1478-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2032</identifier><identifier>PMID: 31400032</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Adult ; Aged ; Bone Screws ; Brain ; Brain - surgery ; Computed tomography ; Deep brain stimulation ; Deep Brain Stimulation - methods ; Electrodes ; Female ; Human health and pathology ; Humans ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional ; Implantation ; Life Sciences ; Male ; Medical imaging ; Middle Aged ; Motor Skills ; movement disorder ; Movement Disorders - surgery ; Reproducibility of Results ; Retrospective Studies ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robots ; robot‐assisted surgery ; Stereotaxic Techniques ; Stimulation ; Subthalamic Nucleus - physiology ; Surgery ; Tissues and Organs ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><ispartof>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery, 2019-12, Vol.15 (6), p.e2032-n/a</ispartof><rights>2019 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3832-d10f8a382995ea2c5720312366421f5361c9033907b1ff01e987950424e0fdc33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3832-d10f8a382995ea2c5720312366421f5361c9033907b1ff01e987950424e0fdc33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-2706-965X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Frcs.2032$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Frcs.2032$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45573,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31400032$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://normandie-univ.hal.science/hal-02368430$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Goia, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilard, Vianney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welter, Marie‐Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltête, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derrey, Stephane</creatorcontrib><title>Accuracy of the robot‐assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation</title><title>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</title><addtitle>Int J Med Robot</addtitle><description>Introduction
The use of a robot‐assisted technology becomes very competitive. The aim of this work was to define the accuracy of robotic assistance in deep brain stimulation surgery and to compare results with that in the literature.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of lead implantation in 24 consecutive patients who had robot‐assisted (ROSA, Zimmer‐Biomet) surgery for the treatment of movement disorders. Intended stereotactic coordinates (x, y, z) of contact 0 (the most distal contact at the tip of the electrode) of each definitive lead were compared with actual coordinates obtained by a postoperative CT scan. For each lead, the euclidian 3D distance between the actual and intended location of contact 0 was calculated.
Results
The euclidian 3D distances between the intended and actual location of the contact 0 were 0.81 mm on the right side and 1.12 mm on the left side.
Discussion
Robot‐assisted technology for stereotactic surgery is safe and accurate. The association with a 3D flat‐panel CT scan is an optimized procedure for deep intracranial electrode implantation.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Bone Screws</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain - surgery</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Deep brain stimulation</subject><subject>Deep Brain Stimulation - methods</subject><subject>Electrodes</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human health and pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</subject><subject>Implantation</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motor Skills</subject><subject>movement disorder</subject><subject>Movement Disorders - surgery</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robots</subject><subject>robot‐assisted surgery</subject><subject>Stereotaxic Techniques</subject><subject>Stimulation</subject><subject>Subthalamic Nucleus - physiology</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tissues and Organs</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><issn>1478-5951</issn><issn>1478-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kctKw0AUhgdRbK2CTyABN7pIPXNJMlmWeqlQELyAu2EymdCUJFNnEqU7H8Fn9Emc2lpBcDWH4ePjP-dH6BjDEAOQC6vckAAlO6iPWcLDKI2fd7dzhHvowLk5AItYzPZRj2IG4Pk-uhwp1VmploEpgnamA2sy036-f0jnStfqPFhYo3TeWR2UTZBrvQgyK_3o2rLuKtmWpjlEe4WsnD7avAP0dH31OJ6E07ub2_FoGirKKQlzDAWXlJM0jbQkKkp8ZkxoHDOCi4jGWKVAaQpJhosCsE55kkbACNNQ5IrSATpfe2eyEgtb1tIuhZGlmIymYvUHXsYZhVfs2bM16_O_dNq1oi6d0lUlG206JwhJMKeAY-7R0z_o3HS28ZsIQnEKnMck-hUqa5yzutgmwCBWLQjfgli14NGTjbDLap1vwZ-zeyBcA29lpZf_isT9-OFb-AXxfI2S</recordid><startdate>201912</startdate><enddate>201912</enddate><creator>Goia, Alice</creator><creator>Gilard, Vianney</creator><creator>Lefaucheur, Romain</creator><creator>Welter, Marie‐Laure</creator><creator>Maltête, David</creator><creator>Derrey, Stephane</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>John Wiley & Sons, Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-965X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201912</creationdate><title>Accuracy of the robot‐assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation</title><author>Goia, Alice ; Gilard, Vianney ; Lefaucheur, Romain ; Welter, Marie‐Laure ; Maltête, David ; Derrey, Stephane</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3832-d10f8a382995ea2c5720312366421f5361c9033907b1ff01e987950424e0fdc33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Bone Screws</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain - surgery</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Deep brain stimulation</topic><topic>Deep Brain Stimulation - methods</topic><topic>Electrodes</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human health and pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional</topic><topic>Implantation</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motor Skills</topic><topic>movement disorder</topic><topic>Movement Disorders - surgery</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robots</topic><topic>robot‐assisted surgery</topic><topic>Stereotaxic Techniques</topic><topic>Stimulation</topic><topic>Subthalamic Nucleus - physiology</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tissues and Organs</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Goia, Alice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gilard, Vianney</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lefaucheur, Romain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Welter, Marie‐Laure</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maltête, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Derrey, Stephane</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics & Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical & Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology & Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Goia, Alice</au><au>Gilard, Vianney</au><au>Lefaucheur, Romain</au><au>Welter, Marie‐Laure</au><au>Maltête, David</au><au>Derrey, Stephane</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accuracy of the robot‐assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Med Robot</addtitle><date>2019-12</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>e2032</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>e2032-n/a</pages><issn>1478-5951</issn><eissn>1478-596X</eissn><abstract>Introduction
The use of a robot‐assisted technology becomes very competitive. The aim of this work was to define the accuracy of robotic assistance in deep brain stimulation surgery and to compare results with that in the literature.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of lead implantation in 24 consecutive patients who had robot‐assisted (ROSA, Zimmer‐Biomet) surgery for the treatment of movement disorders. Intended stereotactic coordinates (x, y, z) of contact 0 (the most distal contact at the tip of the electrode) of each definitive lead were compared with actual coordinates obtained by a postoperative CT scan. For each lead, the euclidian 3D distance between the actual and intended location of contact 0 was calculated.
Results
The euclidian 3D distances between the intended and actual location of the contact 0 were 0.81 mm on the right side and 1.12 mm on the left side.
Discussion
Robot‐assisted technology for stereotactic surgery is safe and accurate. The association with a 3D flat‐panel CT scan is an optimized procedure for deep intracranial electrode implantation.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><pmid>31400032</pmid><doi>10.1002/rcs.2032</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2706-965X</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1478-5951 |
| ispartof | The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery, 2019-12, Vol.15 (6), p.e2032-n/a |
| issn | 1478-5951 1478-596X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_02368430v1 |
| source | MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library All Journals |
| subjects | Accuracy Adult Aged Bone Screws Brain Brain - surgery Computed tomography Deep brain stimulation Deep Brain Stimulation - methods Electrodes Female Human health and pathology Humans Imaging, Three-Dimensional Implantation Life Sciences Male Medical imaging Middle Aged Motor Skills movement disorder Movement Disorders - surgery Reproducibility of Results Retrospective Studies Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robots robot‐assisted surgery Stereotaxic Techniques Stimulation Subthalamic Nucleus - physiology Surgery Tissues and Organs Tomography, X-Ray Computed |
| title | Accuracy of the robot‐assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T00%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accuracy%20of%20the%20robot%E2%80%90assisted%20procedure%20in%20deep%20brain%20stimulation&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20medical%20robotics%20+%20computer%20assisted%20surgery&rft.au=Goia,%20Alice&rft.date=2019-12&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=e2032&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=e2032-n/a&rft.issn=1478-5951&rft.eissn=1478-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/rcs.2032&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_hal_p%3E2319088625%3C/proquest_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2319088625&rft_id=info:pmid/31400032&rfr_iscdi=true |