The cost of the conversion of L-methionine precursors in mammals and birds

To fulfil the requirements for methionine, animal diets are widely supplemented with synthetic methionine sources such as L-methionine (L-Met), DL-methionine (DL-Met), and DL-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (DL-OH-Met). The objective of this study is to calculate the energy cost of the differ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: van Milgen, J, Batonon-Alavo, D.I, Mercier, Y, Ferrer, R, Toscan, A, Martin-Venegas, R
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To fulfil the requirements for methionine, animal diets are widely supplemented with synthetic methionine sources such as L-methionine (L-Met), DL-methionine (DL-Met), and DL-2-hydroxy-4-(methylthio)-butanoic acid (DL-OH-Met). The objective of this study is to calculate the energy cost of the different conversion steps leading to L-Met and to propose energy equivalence values for DL-Met and DL-OH-Met, relative to that of L-Met. The conversion of DL-OH-Met to L-Met involves a nitrogen-sparing effect, because excess nitrogen can be used for the transformation of DL-OH-Met to L-Met, rather than being excreted as urea or uric acid Consequently, the ME-to-GE ratio of DL-OH-Met is 109% in mammals and 114% in birds, compared to the value of DL-Met. Because of differences in metabolism and the formation of hydrogen peroxide in the conversion to L-Met, the NE-to-ME ratios are 96% for DL-Met and 100% for DL-OH-Met in both mammals and birds. The conversion of DL-OH-Met to L-Met is therefore energetically less costly than the conversion of DL-Met. The stoichiometric approach presented here only considers the biochemical conversion steps, without considering the cost of transport and further transformation steps.
ISSN:0071-2477
DOI:10.3920/978-90-8686-891-9_108