A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD
Introduction Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, is the only approved fixed-dose combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β 2 -agonist (LAMA/LABA) delivered via MDI. Direct comparisons of GFF MDI vers...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Advances in therapy 2019-09, Vol.36 (9), p.2434-2449 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Introduction
Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, is the only approved fixed-dose combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β
2
-agonist (LAMA/LABA) delivered via MDI. Direct comparisons of GFF MDI versus other LAMA/LABAs have not previously been performed. We assessed the efficacy and safety of GFF MDI relative to umeclidinium/vilanterol dry powder inhaler (UV DPI) in patients with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Methods
In this phase IIIb randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, 24-week study, patients received GFF MDI 18/9.6 μg (equivalent to glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 14.4/10 μg; two inhalations per dose, twice-daily;
n
= 559) or UV DPI 62.5/25 μg (one inhalation, once-daily;
n
= 560). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV
1
) and peak change from baseline in FEV
1
within 2 h post-dose, both over 24 weeks. Additional lung function, symptom and safety endpoints were also assessed.
Results
For the primary endpoints, GFF MDI was non-inferior to UV DPI (using a margin of − 50 mL) for peak FEV
1
(least squares mean [LSM] difference − 3.4 mL, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] − 32.8, 25.9) but not for trough FEV
1
(LSM difference − 87.2 mL; − 117.0, − 57.4). GFF MDI was nominally superior to UV DPI for onset of action (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0741-238X 1865-8652 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12325-019-01015-3 |