A Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Study of Glycopyrrolate/Formoterol Fumarate Metered Dose Inhaler Relative to Umeclidinium/Vilanterol Dry Powder Inhaler in COPD

Introduction Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, is the only approved fixed-dose combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β 2 -agonist (LAMA/LABA) delivered via MDI. Direct comparisons of GFF MDI vers...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Advances in therapy 2019-09, Vol.36 (9), p.2434-2449
Hauptverfasser: Maltais, François, Ferguson, Gary T., Feldman, Gregory J., Deslee, Gaëtan, Bourdin, Arnaud, Fjällbrant, Harald, Siwek-Posłuszna, Agnieszka, Jenkins, Martin A., Martin, Ubaldo J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Introduction Glycopyrrolate/formoterol fumarate metered dose inhaler (GFF MDI), formulated using co-suspension delivery technology, is the only approved fixed-dose combination long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting β 2 -agonist (LAMA/LABA) delivered via MDI. Direct comparisons of GFF MDI versus other LAMA/LABAs have not previously been performed. We assessed the efficacy and safety of GFF MDI relative to umeclidinium/vilanterol dry powder inhaler (UV DPI) in patients with moderate-to-very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods In this phase IIIb randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, 24-week study, patients received GFF MDI 18/9.6 μg (equivalent to glycopyrronium/formoterol fumarate dihydrate 14.4/10 μg; two inhalations per dose, twice-daily; n  = 559) or UV DPI 62.5/25 μg (one inhalation, once-daily; n  = 560). Primary endpoints were change from baseline in morning pre-dose trough forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 ) and peak change from baseline in FEV 1 within 2 h post-dose, both over 24 weeks. Additional lung function, symptom and safety endpoints were also assessed. Results For the primary endpoints, GFF MDI was non-inferior to UV DPI (using a margin of − 50 mL) for peak FEV 1 (least squares mean [LSM] difference − 3.4 mL, 97.5% confidence interval [CI] − 32.8, 25.9) but not for trough FEV 1 (LSM difference − 87.2 mL; − 117.0, − 57.4). GFF MDI was nominally superior to UV DPI for onset of action ( p  
ISSN:0741-238X
1865-8652
DOI:10.1007/s12325-019-01015-3