CCM.G-K2 key comparison

CCM.G-K2 key comparison

In November 2013 an International Key Comparison, CCM.G-K2, was organized in the Underground Laboratory for Geodynamics in Walferdange. The comparison has assembled 25 participants coming from 19 countries and four different continents. The comparison was divided into two parts: the key comparison t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Metrologia 2015-01, Vol.52 (1A), p.7009-7009
Hauptverfasser: Francis, Olivier, Baumann, Henri, Ullrich, Christian, Castelein, Stefaan, Van Camp, Michel, Andrade de Sousa, Mauro, Lima Melhorato, Rodrigo, Li, Chunjian, Xu, Jinyi, Su, Duowu, Wu, Shuqing, Hu, Hua, Wu, Kang, Li, Gang, Li, Zhe, Hsieh, Wen-Chi, Vojtech Ṕlinḱs, Pecný, Kostelecký, Jakub, Mäkinen, Jaakko, Näränen, Jyri, Merlet, Sébastien, Pereira Dos Santos, Franck, Gillot, Pierre, Hinderer, Jacques, Bernard, Jean-Daniel, Le Moigne, Nicolas, Fores, Benjamin, Gitlein, Olga, Schilling, Manuel, Falk, Reinhard, Wilmes, Herbert, Germak, Alessandro, Biolcati, Emanuele, Origlia, Claudio, Iacovone, Domenico, Baccaro, Francesco, Mizushima, Shigeki, De Plaen, Raphaël, Klein, Gilbert, Seil, Marc, Radinovic, Remi, Sekowski, Marcin, Dykowski, Przemyslaw, Choi, In-Mook, Kim, Min-Seok, Borreguero, Ana, Sainz-Maza, Sergio, Calvo, Marta, Engfeldt, Andreas, Agren, Jonas, Reudink, René, Eckl, Mark, van Westrum, Derek, Billson, Ryan, Ellis, Brian
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Earth Sciences
Geophysics
Sciences of the Universe
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In November 2013 an International Key Comparison, CCM.G-K2, was organized in the Underground Laboratory for Geodynamics in Walferdange. The comparison has assembled 25 participants coming from 19 countries and four different continents. The comparison was divided into two parts: the key comparison that included 10 NMIs or DIs, and the pilot study including all participants. The global result given by the pilot study confirms that all instruments are absolutely coherent to each other. The results obtained for the key comparison confirm a good agreement between the NMI instruments.
ISSN:0026-1394
1681-7575
DOI:10.1088/0026-1394/52/1A/07009